Society - Written by Paul Artiuch on Tuesday, November 24, 2009 12:04 - 2 Comments
Footprints in the store
In past posts I have explored various ways consumers can make more informed decisions about the products they buy. It seems that we are slowly emerging from the dark ages. For instance, companies like GoodGuide are compiling detailed environmental and social impact information on thousands of products. Similarly Wal-Mart is rolling out a Sustainability Index which will ultimately inform consumers about the products they buy.
Other retailers as well as producers are catching on. In August, U.K. grocer Tesco became one of the first to display carbon footprint information for one of its most popular products (milk). The company plans to label up to 500 other items by the end of the year. Product makers such as PepsiCo are also leading the way. The company’s popular Walkers branded chips have had carbon footprint labels for the past two years. Max, a Swedish burger chain, displays emissions calculations on its menus.
While all these efforts are commendable, and perhaps indicative of emerging consumer demands for more information, none are widespread or accurate enough to make a significant impact. Part of the problem is that the market for consumer information still lacks standards. For instance there is no single way to calculate a product’s carbon footprint or a set definition for “organic”. The practical measurement issues are also significant. With global supply chains, similar products may be produced in two different parts of the world and have widely different impacts on society and the environment.
Flexible, real time systems based on common standards are needed to truly revolutionize the way people make purchasing decisions. The tools already exist – sensors, RFID, supply chain management software and new analytics tools allow us to collect and analyze vast amounts of data about products including materials, components, sourcing and transportation. The information can be used to calculate the environmental impacts through life cycle assessment. Accounting and reporting standards are being developed by organizations such as The Greenhouse Gas Protocol Initiative to provide a common set of frameworks and practices.
We are still a few years away from having all relevant information about our purchases at our fingertips. After all, even retailers and producers don’t have that single view yet. However, with ongoing initiatives at multiple levels, things seem to be moving in the right direction.
2 Comments
Gautam
Hi Paul,
I recently came across http://stage.sourcemap.org, a pilot site to “crowdource” the supply chain of products and their footprint. You might be interested in taking a look – it goes in the direction you are indicating.
Business - Oct 5, 2010 12:00 - 0 Comments
DRM and us
More In Business
- Facebook, Facebook, Facebook
- Survey: How are you using Facebook, Twitter, smart phones, and other technology platforms?
- Will Facebook be your CRM provider?
- Wiki Banking
- The importance of being competent
Entertainment - Aug 3, 2010 13:14 - 2 Comments
Want to see the future? Look to the games
More In Entertainment
- Lessons in collaboration from B.B. King’s
- CL!CK – LEGO’s fun social product development platform
- Peer Pressure 2.0: Farmville
- Online gaming more than just fun
- The NFL – The most protective league, attempting to control the uncontrollable
Society - Aug 6, 2010 8:19 - 4 Comments
The Empire strikes a light
More In Society
- Balance: customer receptivity vs. customer revulsion
- The Net Gen: Too plugged-in for parenting?
- Are you addicted to social media?
- The privacy discussion we need to have
- “The Data-Driven Life”: Who’s not interested in discovery?

Coming soon in paperback! Help rename the paperback version of Macrowikinomics and win a one-hour webinar for you and your colleagues with Don Tapscott. Ends 5:00pm ET, August 31.
“Flexible, real time systems based on common standards are needed to truly revolutionize the way people make purchasing decisions.”
I agree with this but not 100%. Yes we need flexible, real time systems but not common standards.
Common standards imply that everyone holds the same needs and values at the same time, which simply does not happen.
Take emissions for example, the EU and the US can afford to lower their targets and set a lower limit on the total amount, simply because they do not have as much heavy industry. India and China?? not so much.
What may work better is to have a licensed 3rd party comparative rating. For example, product X has a 8/10 on pollution generated while product Y has a 7/10. That makes in-store comparisons extremely easy to make and promotes competition amongst producers.
An additional “clean-up” multiplier for the type of pollution created can be added to give the consumer a sense of the true cost of a product.
This levels the playing field for products such as those that use eco-friendly manufacturing, which most times leads to higher prices but a lower clean-up cost to the environment.