Society - Written by Paul Artiuch on Tuesday, November 24, 2009 12:04 - 2 Comments
Footprints in the store
In past posts I have explored various ways consumers can make more informed decisions about the products they buy. It seems that we are slowly emerging from the dark ages. For instance, companies like GoodGuide are compiling detailed environmental and social impact information on thousands of products. Similarly Wal-Mart is rolling out a Sustainability Index which will ultimately inform consumers about the products they buy.
Other retailers as well as producers are catching on. In August, U.K. grocer Tesco became one of the first to display carbon footprint information for one of its most popular products (milk). The company plans to label up to 500 other items by the end of the year. Product makers such as PepsiCo are also leading the way. The company’s popular Walkers branded chips have had carbon footprint labels for the past two years. Max, a Swedish burger chain, displays emissions calculations on its menus.
While all these efforts are commendable, and perhaps indicative of emerging consumer demands for more information, none are widespread or accurate enough to make a significant impact. Part of the problem is that the market for consumer information still lacks standards. For instance there is no single way to calculate a product’s carbon footprint or a set definition for “organic”. The practical measurement issues are also significant. With global supply chains, similar products may be produced in two different parts of the world and have widely different impacts on society and the environment.
Flexible, real time systems based on common standards are needed to truly revolutionize the way people make purchasing decisions. The tools already exist – sensors, RFID, supply chain management software and new analytics tools allow us to collect and analyze vast amounts of data about products including materials, components, sourcing and transportation. The information can be used to calculate the environmental impacts through life cycle assessment. Accounting and reporting standards are being developed by organizations such as The Greenhouse Gas Protocol Initiative to provide a common set of frameworks and practices.
We are still a few years away from having all relevant information about our purchases at our fingertips. After all, even retailers and producers don’t have that single view yet. However, with ongoing initiatives at multiple levels, things seem to be moving in the right direction.
2 Comments
Gautam
Hi Paul,
I recently came across http://stage.sourcemap.org, a pilot site to “crowdource” the supply chain of products and their footprint. You might be interested in taking a look – it goes in the direction you are indicating.
Leave a Reply
Browse Content
- Car 2.0 - How a community builds a car
- The iPhone, growing up digital, and my daughter's education
- The dangers of GeoTweeting: PleaseRobMe.com
- Playbor: When work and fun coincide
- Lessons in collaboration from B.B. King’s
- A decade of frustration ahead?
- Games, user experience, and retroactive Continuity--All enabled by platforms
- Survey: How prepared is the enterprise to lead in the age of unbounded data?
- When you ask customers to dance, let them lead
- Real world examples for collaboration ROI
- Will You Use Target’s Mobile Coupons?
- Lessons in collaboration from B.B. King’s
- Games, user experience, and retroactive Continuity–All enabled by platforms
- Survey: How prepared is the enterprise to lead in the age of unbounded data?
- A decade of frustration ahead?
- The iPhone, growing up digital, and my daughter’s education
- Real world examples for collaboration ROI
- Playbor: When work and fun coincide
- Security, security, security…
- When you ask customers to dance, let them lead
- Car 2.0 – How a community builds a car
- Due to global financial crisis companies and individuals are affected. Many work...
- Good post Naumi,
I like how you relate the jazz band performance to customer ...
- Hi Marilyn,
Thanks for the quote! I agree that some of the most interesting...
- Hi Friends H r u? I hope all is well...This is very true! Most gamers I know hav...
- Wonderful rich thought provoking analogies and a re quote of a favourite quote f...
- Whitney,
Thanks, I will. Check out this post from me http://www.wikinomics.com...
- Online business games is really a very difficult thing to understand... But ofco...
- I recommend reading Cass Sunstein's Republic.com 2.0. Although the book really ...
Business - Mar 11, 2010 8:56 - 0 Comments
Will You Use Target’s Mobile Coupons?
More In Business
- Games, user experience, and retroactive Continuity–All enabled by platforms
- Survey: How prepared is the enterprise to lead in the age of unbounded data?
- Real world examples for collaboration ROI
- When you ask customers to dance, let them lead
- Car 2.0 – How a community builds a car
Entertainment - Mar 9, 2010 16:58 - 3 Comments
Lessons in collaboration from B.B. King’s
More In Entertainment
- CL!CK – LEGO’s fun social product development platform
- Peer Pressure 2.0: Farmville
- Online gaming more than just fun
- The NFL – The most protective league, attempting to control the uncontrollable
- The rise of computational photography and the birth of camera 2.0
Government, Society - Mar 5, 2010 6:01 - 2 Comments
A decade of frustration ahead?
More In Society
- The iPhone, growing up digital, and my daughter’s education
- Playbor: When work and fun coincide
- Security, security, security…
- The dangers of GeoTweeting: PleaseRobMe.com
- Self-destructing data: The return of Internet privacy


“Flexible, real time systems based on common standards are needed to truly revolutionize the way people make purchasing decisions.”
I agree with this but not 100%. Yes we need flexible, real time systems but not common standards.
Common standards imply that everyone holds the same needs and values at the same time, which simply does not happen.
Take emissions for example, the EU and the US can afford to lower their targets and set a lower limit on the total amount, simply because they do not have as much heavy industry. India and China?? not so much.
What may work better is to have a licensed 3rd party comparative rating. For example, product X has a 8/10 on pollution generated while product Y has a 7/10. That makes in-store comparisons extremely easy to make and promotes competition amongst producers.
An additional “clean-up” multiplier for the type of pollution created can be added to give the consumer a sense of the true cost of a product.
This levels the playing field for products such as those that use eco-friendly manufacturing, which most times leads to higher prices but a lower clean-up cost to the environment.