Society - Written by Paul Artiuch on Tuesday, November 24, 2009 12:04 - 2 Comments

Paul Artiuch
Footprints in the store

In past posts I have explored various ways consumers can make more informed decisions about the products they buy. It seems that we are slowly emerging from the dark ages. For instance, companies like GoodGuide are compiling detailed environmental and social impact information on thousands of products. Similarly Wal-Mart is rolling out a Sustainability Index which will ultimately inform consumers about the products they buy.

Other retailers as well as producers are catching on. In August, U.K. grocer Tesco became one of the first to display carbon footprint information for one of its most popular products (milk). The company plans to label up to 500 other items by the end of the year. Product makers such as PepsiCo are also leading the way. The company’s popular Walkers branded chips have had carbon footprint labels for the past two years. Max, a Swedish burger chain, displays emissions calculations on its menus.

While all these efforts are commendable, and perhaps indicative of emerging consumer demands for more information, none are widespread or accurate enough to make a significant impact. Part of the problem is that the market for consumer information still lacks standards. For instance there is no single way to calculate a product’s carbon footprint or a set definition for “organic”. The practical measurement issues are also significant. With global supply chains, similar products may be produced in two different parts of the world and have widely different impacts on society and the environment.

Flexible, real time systems based on common standards are needed to truly revolutionize the way people make purchasing decisions. The tools already exist – sensors, RFID, supply chain management software and new analytics tools allow us to collect and analyze vast amounts of data about products including materials, components, sourcing and transportation. The information can be used to calculate the environmental impacts through life cycle assessment. Accounting and reporting standards are being developed by organizations such as The Greenhouse Gas Protocol Initiative to provide a common set of frameworks and practices.

We are still a few years away from having all relevant information about our purchases at our fingertips. After all, even retailers and producers don’t have that single view yet. However, with ongoing initiatives at multiple levels, things seem to be moving in the right direction.



2 Comments

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Gautam
Nov 27, 2009 17:35

“Flexible, real time systems based on common standards are needed to truly revolutionize the way people make purchasing decisions.”

I agree with this but not 100%. Yes we need flexible, real time systems but not common standards.
Common standards imply that everyone holds the same needs and values at the same time, which simply does not happen.
Take emissions for example, the EU and the US can afford to lower their targets and set a lower limit on the total amount, simply because they do not have as much heavy industry. India and China?? not so much.

What may work better is to have a licensed 3rd party comparative rating. For example, product X has a 8/10 on pollution generated while product Y has a 7/10. That makes in-store comparisons extremely easy to make and promotes competition amongst producers.
An additional “clean-up” multiplier for the type of pollution created can be added to give the consumer a sense of the true cost of a product.
This levels the playing field for products such as those that use eco-friendly manufacturing, which most times leads to higher prices but a lower clean-up cost to the environment.

giulio quaggiotto
Nov 30, 2009 14:55

Hi Paul,

I recently came across http://stage.sourcemap.org, a pilot site to “crowdource” the supply chain of products and their footprint. You might be interested in taking a look – it goes in the direction you are indicating.

Leave a Reply

Comment

Browse Content

Business - Mar 11, 2010 8:56 - 0 Comments

Will You Use Target’s Mobile Coupons?

More In Business


Entertainment - Mar 9, 2010 16:58 - 3 Comments

Lessons in collaboration from B.B. King’s

More In Entertainment


Government, Society - Mar 5, 2010 6:01 - 2 Comments

A decade of frustration ahead?

More In Society