girls get laid

swinger couples

swinger date club

rencontres coquines

swinger dating

downers grove singles

frindfinder com

muslim dating services

singles 4

mature women for

colombian women dating

looking for female sex

dating online south africa

bi sexual mmf

uk singals

singles track

free muslim dating sites

swinger clubs in texas

couples ocho rios

www fantasme com

online dating birmingham

dating service website

dating internet profile

sex housewife

sex wive

latinas calientes

fayetteville arkansas dating

sexsi girl

jefferson city singles

arab dating sites

single woman dating

meeting single woman

find sex in london

yahoo singles com

christian singles website

escort in virginia

fairbanks alaska singles

las vegas dating

uk sex parties

dating match online

cooking for couples

mature swinger

searching for a date

dallas catholic singles

free christian dating online

sex hot sites

new datingsite

ladyboy personals

swappers com

www sex online

dating book reviews

credit card sex chat

housewife looking for sex

denver singles dating

russian personals

meeting russian women

gay encounters

baltimore swinger

swing stock

homestead singles

personals singles

american singles club

swinger ohio

dawson creek singles

gothic personals

couples looking for sex

personal medical coverage

cheap sex phone

singles events washington

greatdatingsite

store adult

singles dallas

100bestdatingsites

man dating

a sex

edmonton christian singles

sexsearchcom

click five singles

sex cam videos

american singles events

sex seach

tampa singles events

singles court

mature housewife

watch gay sex

mobile phone sex lines

bi personals

singles bars connecticut

dating site cupid

chat hot

free personality profile

web affairs

phoenix personals

signles

senior dating

asian chat cam

dating services new york

singles and doubles

catholic singles dating

nasty housewife

Business - Written by on Thursday, October 1, 2009 7:40 - 4 Comments

Laura M.  Carrillo
2.0 Policies – If You Don’t Have ‘Um You Need ‘Um

As my colleague, Nick, mentioned in his post last week, we recently published a study entitled Redefining Employee Computing. It encompassed over 18 months of research, interviews and focus groups, and was sponsored by 30 global organizations, many of them household names. One area of the findings I’d like to discuss is the idea of “controlling” an employee’s computing environment. While many organizations think there is a way to actually accomplish this, the most forward thinking companies accept the fact that their employees discuss company business whether or not the company likes it or is even aware of  it. Employees are also going to be working from anywhere that has an internet connection, via any device they’d like (phone, PDA, laptop, etc) so security policies and access need to adjust based on that. Given the needs and behaviors of employees as well as the connectedness that the internet offers do you know how far and how fast your policies need to change? We expect a variety of policies to be revised or developed to enable new models of employee computing:

  • Web 2.0 & Social computing behavior In many companies this is new ground for employee and technology policy. These policies outline expectations for employees’ communication and behavior when using Web 2.0 technology, not only on the job, but anytime they can be identified as employees of the corporation. Today, everyone with an online presence is in a sense (or may be perceived to be) a spokesperson for the company. Every day brings news stories of people and organizations learning the new rules of the road the hard way, ranging from silly (bad-mouthing the boss on Facebook after you’ve “friended” him) to the serious (discussing product plans or arguing product quality with competitors on online forums). Remember, employees have always had the ability to pick up a phone or send out an email with unacceptable company content. The difference in the 2.0 world is the breadth and speed of the channel. News, true or untrue, spreads very fast. A few years ago Yahoo announced a reduction in the workforce but did not publicly disclose what parts of the organization were affected. However, upset employees posted notes online and it became clear quite quickly what groups were involved. A Web 2.0 policy and diligent use agreement may not have changed the Yahoo situation but it could have substantially decreased the amount of traffic initially posted. Far better to establish some basic rules of the road than to keep learning the hard way, or try to close the road altogether.
  • Self-service rights and responsibilities As employees are permitted more control over their computing set-ups, they need to understand the limits of what they can do on their own and the responsibilities they are assuming, especially if self-service extends to hardware purchase, configuration, or service; software selection and maintenance; vendor contracts (e.g., for telecom services); and any facets of systems administration (e.g., backup and recovery). Define what employees must or can do on their own. Also define the flip-side – what they can not do or must seek help with.
  • Laptop and PDA configurations This is a more technical policy companion to self-service rights. The approach may vary by employee segment. For technologically adept employees, those who are self-sufficient and really want to manage their computing environments, define the basic standards and protocols that must be met in order to operate with the corporate infrastructure. For those who are technologically capable but not gung-ho, define a limited number of packages (hardware, software, communications) from which to choose. The packages may be attuned to roles (e.g., sales) or work patterns (e.g., road warriors). For those who don’t want the responsibility, a standard company configuration should still be an option.
  • Vendor and license management This is another set of adjustments driven by the two points above, self-service and variable configurations. Does the company want to purchase hardware and license software in bulk for the sake of volume discounts, then resell or reissue to employees? Or really get out of the provisioning business and let employees serve themselves, but set up standing arrangements with key vendors (e.g., for discounts in return for guaranteed volume, or for group service plans)?

Of course, most of these policies are not brand new. Many companies are building on existing policies and adding information about new technologies, primarily email and the internet in general. Now is a good time to review your policy set and expand it to include Web 2.0 tools. Chances are you will also need to revisit your guidelines around information, IP, and privacy as well. As the market continues to add new ways of sharing information and collaborating with each other, enterprises need to keep up by recognizing trends early, learning about the implications on their businesses and ensuring that policies morph as quickly as employees’ computing environments do. Click the link to read more about the Redefining Employee Computing study.



4 Comments

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

michael mcdonnell
Oct 1, 2009 9:16

I continue to be blown away by my colleagues comments on this blog -we need to install a sharing capability here so this stuff can be socilaized and the evangilizing can continue !!

SteveG
Oct 1, 2009 9:25

Hi Laura – did you happen to see the progressive work by the UK in publishing Twitter policy? Pretty neat: http://blogs.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/digitalengagement/post/2009/07/21/Template-Twitter-strategy-for-Government-Departments.aspx

Laura Carrillo
Oct 1, 2009 9:47

Hi Steve,
I had not seen that work, good stuff. I especially like the idea of the template they offer for other departments to tweak and use.

Marc Dierens
Oct 1, 2009 9:53

This is becoming more and more a necessity in any company or organisation, big or small. There are so many opportunities out there to use fascination technology that people inevitably will be using them, often causing harm to the company without intent.

As an example, we are using spreadsheets for our internal forecasting process. I wanted to move this process over to Google Docs, as we could then use links for automated updating of new data. We received a no on this request, as this vital data would be going outside of our WAN.

We complied, but I wonder if everybody is as careful as we are.

Coming soon in paperback! Help rename the paperback version of Macrowikinomics and win a one-hour webinar for you and your colleagues with Don Tapscott. Ends 5:00pm ET, August 31. Learn more.

Business - Oct 5, 2010 12:00 - 0 Comments

DRM and us

More In Business


Entertainment - Aug 3, 2010 13:14 - 2 Comments

Want to see the future? Look to the games

More In Entertainment


Society - Aug 6, 2010 8:19 - 4 Comments

The Empire strikes a light

More In Society