Featured - Written by Mark Drapeau on Thursday, September 3, 2009 9:30 - 3 Comments
Intelligently Filtering Journalists’ (Crowd)Sources
(Editor’s Note: Dr. Mark Drapeau is an adjunct faculty member in the School of Media and Public Affairs of The George Washington University in Washington, DC. He is also a corporate and government advisor, and a contributing writer for Federal Computer Week, Washington Life, and other publications.)
Readily available transparent communications are changing how people form and use social networks in their personal lives. When anyone with a phone can instantly publish every moment of their lives in real-time, flirtations, relationships, and other personal interactions increasingly play out right before our eyes. The “new paparazzi” are amateurs armed with smartphones capable of real-time, transparent reporting on anything they see, anytime, anywhere. Ten years ago, mobile phones were relatively uncommon, yet tweens now demand unlimited texting, mobile maps, and three megapixel cameras. Highly mobile, entirely digital, completely transparent, real-time gonzo reporting isn’t on the average person’s mental radar just yet. But how long will that last?
Emerging new media technology has resulted in an enormous rise in visibility of real (and imagined) niche subject matter experts who draw greater attention to their knowledge than ever before, and hence accumulate audience share in a competitive information marketplace. They are interviewing their friends at private parties, filming television networks filming “reality” shows, and opining on every topic under the sun. And they’re often closer to the disaster scene, premiere event, or other topic of interest than the mainstream media. When the media is outside the exclusive event and Ashton Kutcher is interviewing his friends using Twitter and UStream inside it, who’s the subject-matter expert? Who’s the reporter?Objective, removed experts are increasingly victims of the phenomenon that David Weinberger describes as “transparency becoming the new objectivity.” The notion of objectivity – the journalistic authority with credentials you can trust without looking into matters any further – has been undone in a new virtual world of hyperlinks and microsharing. Now, audiences want to see where authorities’ ideas came from, see the references they link to, and look at their online social networks. Then they’ll decide as a network of readers who is authoritative, objective, biased, smart, and influential – or not. Credentials will continue to be important when building authority and influence in journalism, but they will probably cease to be sufficient.
In a world where transparency is the new objectivity, audiences increasingly want to get information from accessible, authentic, gonzo subject matter experts. In a recent post I coined the term “bantamweight publishing” to describe the Web posting of globally-accessible information in extremely short bursts. Collectively, this is called “citizen journalism.,” but I think tweeting about Derek Jeter eating at Nobu is behaviorally no different than texting my friend about it. Citizen journalists are nothing more than universal sources.
What has changed is that they are free, real-time, locally global sources that everyone in the world has access to. The information these universal sources share with their bantamweight publishing is archived, and therefore accessible, searchable, discoverable, and easily repurposeable. Audiences are increasingly failing to distinguish the differences between universal sources and the “authoritative” journalism trade. In the era of transparency and authenticity, people in the audience are effectively collecting raw data, conducting mental experiments, and drawing conclusions of their own about what is and is not news. However, when planes crash, flu spreads, and protests rage, one thing hardly anyone knows the answer to is: Which raw sources can I trust? Mainstream media can help to answer that question.
Amateur universal sources will only get more talented and prominent with newer technology, experimentation, and practice. So how can mainstream media survive in an environment where universal sources are giving away the milk for free? An enormous emerging market that large media companies can enter is intelligently collating, analyzing, and presenting real-time and right-time information from millions of universal sources for their readers. When transparency is the new objectivity, media brands can gain credibility with, and provide value to, audiences by doing what lone amateurs cannot: providing a combination of massive analysis, high-quality packaging, and authoritative marketing.
It used to be that people would trust the news from Walter Cronkite. In the near future, people may trust the news that CBS distills from a million distributed Walter Cronkite wannabes.
3 Comments
Lauren
Shared Items: 4 September 2009
[...] Intelligently Filtering Journalists’ (Crowd) Sources. [Wikinomics] Great quote from the article written by Mark Drapeau (I’m a huge fan). “In a world where transparency is the new objectivity, audiences increasingly want to get information from accessible, authentic, gonzo subject matter experts.” It’s also worth reading his O’Reilly piece Bantamweight Publishing in an Easily Plagiarised World. [...]
Will the traditional mainstream media structure will have the flexibility (ability, willingness) to adapt to this role of “intelligently collating, analyzing, and presenting real-time and right-time information from millions of universal sources”? The key, it seems, is “intelligently”; our current search solutions are pretty dumb – the quest is to find solutions that “intelligently ignore unimportant information” (to quote the legendary Perri 6). Web 2.0 pulses with a lot of unstructured text and video and audio data – the challenges of turning this into usable information are enormous.
BTW: CBC Radio “Sunday Edition” has a two-part program called News 2.0 (podcasts and transcripts at http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2009/06/17/f-basen-news-20.html) that resonates with your post. I’m indebted to it principally because it led me to this gem on the value of listener / reader comments on news media blogs: “What do you reckon … We want to know!” http://reportr.net/2008/03/25/mitchell-and-webb-ask-what-do-you-reckon
Leave a Reply
Browse Content
- Questioning the idea that 'the customer is now in control'
- You don't have to engage in conversations to succeed on Twitter
- The importance of being competent
- The importance of being competent
- Two cool maps
- You don’t have to engage in conversations to succeed on Twitter
- A visual model showing the value of open data
- Better parking through technology
- A view of self through a digital mirror
- Questioning the idea that ‘the customer is now in control’
- The Empire strikes a light
- Balance: customer receptivity vs. customer revulsion
- Want to see the future? Look to the games
- Ride and surf
- A download for the N95 (un-modified) would be great. If the GPS and N95 accelero...
- Good point, Pankaj. I should have been more specific. I actually mean competence...
- Competence at technology does not necessary have to mean tech expertise. For exa...
- A key element of the discussion should be how to engage a customer to measure wh...
- Trapster will top 8 M users in 2 weeks. How do they make money?...
- Agree with your post. I think this is based on misunderstanding and miseducation...
- Naumi,
I liked the development of the intersection between numbers of projects...
- Totally agree there's not just one way to use Twitter, and as an example, I have...
Business - Aug 31, 2010 15:47 - 2 Comments
The importance of being competent
More In Business
- Two cool maps
- You don’t have to engage in conversations to succeed on Twitter
- A view of self through a digital mirror
- Questioning the idea that ‘the customer is now in control’
- This never gets old: Social media can cost you your job
Entertainment - Aug 3, 2010 13:14 - 0 Comments
Want to see the future? Look to the games
More In Entertainment
- Lessons in collaboration from B.B. King’s
- CL!CK – LEGO’s fun social product development platform
- Peer Pressure 2.0: Farmville
- Online gaming more than just fun
- The NFL – The most protective league, attempting to control the uncontrollable
Society - Aug 6, 2010 8:19 - 4 Comments
The Empire strikes a light
More In Society
- Balance: customer receptivity vs. customer revulsion
- The Net Gen: Too plugged-in for parenting?
- Are you addicted to social media?
- The privacy discussion we need to have
- “The Data-Driven Life”: Who’s not interested in discovery?


Good article! I’ve also been wondering lately: Where Are Journalism Schools in “Great Debate” Over Journalism’s Future? http://bit.ly/rJfd4 (Poynter).RT @journalistics RT @UGAGrady