<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Monetizing Twitter &#8211; Will other companies beat Twitter at its own game?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2009/08/14/monetizing-twitter-are-other-companies-beating-twitter-at-its-own-game/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2009/08/14/monetizing-twitter-are-other-companies-beating-twitter-at-its-own-game/</link>
	<description>Exploring How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2011 14:21:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denis Hancock</title>
		<link>http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2009/08/14/monetizing-twitter-are-other-companies-beating-twitter-at-its-own-game/comment-page-1/#comment-312394</link>
		<dc:creator>Denis Hancock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/?p=4404#comment-312394</guid>
		<description>brazil oil stocks,

I would agree that it&#039;s unlikely a shopping center will be purchase via Twitter, per se. However, many top investors have openly discussed how, for example, watching what their teenage kids were doing are how they learn about good new investment opportunities. What if you scaled that up to monitoring the behaviors and interests of thousands upon thousands of people that might be customers at one of those shopping centers. Might knowledge of their changing interests lead to better commercial real estate decisions?

I would think it would. Maybe a tool could evolve that would take all that chatter on Twitter from a particular city, and turn it into an indicator of where the next &quot;hot&quot; neighborhood is emerging. Maybe growing discontent about a particular retailers products would provide valuable insight into whether they&#039;re a worthy tenant. Maybe... lots of things.

They say that knowledge is power. You get knowledge from information. So while there may not be a day anytime soon where someone in the commercial real estate business buys a building on Twitter, there may soon be a day where a commercial real estate investor does much better than their competition by turning all that information on Twitter into knowledge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>brazil oil stocks,</p>
<p>I would agree that it&#8217;s unlikely a shopping center will be purchase via Twitter, per se. However, many top investors have openly discussed how, for example, watching what their teenage kids were doing are how they learn about good new investment opportunities. What if you scaled that up to monitoring the behaviors and interests of thousands upon thousands of people that might be customers at one of those shopping centers. Might knowledge of their changing interests lead to better commercial real estate decisions?</p>
<p>I would think it would. Maybe a tool could evolve that would take all that chatter on Twitter from a particular city, and turn it into an indicator of where the next &#8220;hot&#8221; neighborhood is emerging. Maybe growing discontent about a particular retailers products would provide valuable insight into whether they&#8217;re a worthy tenant. Maybe&#8230; lots of things.</p>
<p>They say that knowledge is power. You get knowledge from information. So while there may not be a day anytime soon where someone in the commercial real estate business buys a building on Twitter, there may soon be a day where a commercial real estate investor does much better than their competition by turning all that information on Twitter into knowledge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brazil oil stocks</title>
		<link>http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2009/08/14/monetizing-twitter-are-other-companies-beating-twitter-at-its-own-game/comment-page-1/#comment-312379</link>
		<dc:creator>brazil oil stocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/?p=4404#comment-312379</guid>
		<description>This Twitter stuff may work in the ad business, but as far as my real estate PR world, it is an absolute ridiculous proposition! The day a big real estate client tells me he has purchased a building or sold a shopping center via Twitter is when I decide I no longer want to be in the marketing/public relations upscale imaging side of real estate.

I for one consider some of these new social media propositions like Twitter, Face book and Bogs just what they are — bs! Have you seen the commercial with the young people on the porch with their dad and mom talking about something while dad is sitting down and “twitting” a message “he is now sitting on the porch?” Complete bs, that’s all the majority of this stuff is. Good luck with Twitting in the ad business. I am flexible and may someday change my mind, but for now, no way!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This Twitter stuff may work in the ad business, but as far as my real estate PR world, it is an absolute ridiculous proposition! The day a big real estate client tells me he has purchased a building or sold a shopping center via Twitter is when I decide I no longer want to be in the marketing/public relations upscale imaging side of real estate.</p>
<p>I for one consider some of these new social media propositions like Twitter, Face book and Bogs just what they are — bs! Have you seen the commercial with the young people on the porch with their dad and mom talking about something while dad is sitting down and “twitting” a message “he is now sitting on the porch?” Complete bs, that’s all the majority of this stuff is. Good luck with Twitting in the ad business. I am flexible and may someday change my mind, but for now, no way!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura Carrillo</title>
		<link>http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2009/08/14/monetizing-twitter-are-other-companies-beating-twitter-at-its-own-game/comment-page-1/#comment-303487</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura Carrillo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/?p=4404#comment-303487</guid>
		<description>Thank you Porter. Yes, there are many companies structured to take advantage of the Twitter platform. The ecosystem has gotten quite large which gives Twitter itself a lot of options for different revenue models, partnerships and/or acquisitions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Porter. Yes, there are many companies structured to take advantage of the Twitter platform. The ecosystem has gotten quite large which gives Twitter itself a lot of options for different revenue models, partnerships and/or acquisitions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Porter</title>
		<link>http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2009/08/14/monetizing-twitter-are-other-companies-beating-twitter-at-its-own-game/comment-page-1/#comment-303436</link>
		<dc:creator>Porter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 03:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/?p=4404#comment-303436</guid>
		<description>I think the guys over at Strawpoll (http://strawpollnow.com/) are on to something as well.  Could and should enable brands with followers to actually make Twitter a 1-to-many and back to 1 conversation of sorts, and cheaply enable useful research, even if of a limited or particular value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the guys over at Strawpoll (<a href="http://strawpollnow.com/" rel="nofollow">http://strawpollnow.com/</a>) are on to something as well.  Could and should enable brands with followers to actually make Twitter a 1-to-many and back to 1 conversation of sorts, and cheaply enable useful research, even if of a limited or particular value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

