Comments on: The smaller your home, the cooler your phone http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2008/12/15/the-smaller-your-home-the-cooler-your-phone/ Exploring How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything Sun, 28 Aug 2011 14:21:24 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Wikinomics Blog Archive The smaller your home the cooler your | Outdoor Ceiling Fans http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2008/12/15/the-smaller-your-home-the-cooler-your-phone/comment-page-1/#comment-285599 Wikinomics Blog Archive The smaller your home the cooler your | Outdoor Ceiling Fans Sun, 31 May 2009 14:50:02 +0000 http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/?p=2248#comment-285599 [...] Wikinomics Blog Archive The smaller your home the cooler your Posted by root 8 hours ago (http://www.wikinomics.com) Information mashup http frrl wordpress com on youtube bleeding cash is google trapped based on aaron comment below i thought i 39 d share this your website your comment wikinomics is powered by wordpress Discuss  |  Bury |  News | Wikinomics Blog Archive The smaller your home the cooler your [...] [...] Wikinomics Blog Archive The smaller your home the cooler your Posted by root 8 hours ago (http://www.wikinomics.com) Information mashup http frrl wordpress com on youtube bleeding cash is google trapped based on aaron comment below i thought i 39 d share this your website your comment wikinomics is powered by wordpress Discuss  |  Bury |  News | Wikinomics Blog Archive The smaller your home the cooler your [...]

]]> By: Aaron Kim http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2008/12/15/the-smaller-your-home-the-cooler-your-phone/comment-page-1/#comment-229242 Aaron Kim Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:53:30 +0000 http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/?p=2248#comment-229242 I like the nationmaster site. Humm. Weak correlation eh? At least two possibilities there: my theory is completely wrong, or it needs to be refined. I'm leaning towards the conclusion that all social media and technology adoption patterns need to be assessed within certain boundaries to be meaningful. The reason is that there is a large number of drivers that can determine the adoption outcome, and any single variable will fail to be a good predictor that applies globally. My academic background is in Biology, and I see parallels in trying to explain why, for example, large apes exist in Africa and Asia but not in South America. We may need our own version of Alfred Russel Wallace to examine the geographical patterns for tech adoption :-) I like the nationmaster site. Humm. Weak correlation eh? At least two possibilities there: my theory is completely wrong, or it needs to be refined. I’m leaning towards the conclusion that all social media and technology adoption patterns need to be assessed within certain boundaries to be meaningful. The reason is that there is a large number of drivers that can determine the adoption outcome, and any single variable will fail to be a good predictor that applies globally. My academic background is in Biology, and I see parallels in trying to explain why, for example, large apes exist in Africa and Asia but not in South America. We may need our own version of Alfred Russel Wallace to examine the geographical patterns for tech adoption :-)

]]> By: Naumi Haque http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2008/12/15/the-smaller-your-home-the-cooler-your-phone/comment-page-1/#comment-227804 Naumi Haque Sat, 20 Dec 2008 04:11:56 +0000 http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/?p=2248#comment-227804 Thanks Aaron. Great video - I think everyone should check it out: http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/malcolm_gladwell_on_spaghetti_sauce.html. Also, I looked for data on home sizes and found this amazing Web site: www.nationmaster.com and even a ready-made graph for home size vs. mobile: http://www.nationmaster.com/plot/peo_siz_of_hou/med_mob_pho/flag Thanks Aaron. Great video – I think everyone should check it out:
http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/malcolm_gladwell_on_spaghetti_sauce.html.

Also, I looked for data on home sizes and found this amazing Web site:
http://www.nationmaster.com
and even a ready-made graph for home size vs. mobile:
http://www.nationmaster.com/plot/peo_siz_of_hou/med_mob_pho/flag

]]> By: Aaron Kim http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2008/12/15/the-smaller-your-home-the-cooler-your-phone/comment-page-1/#comment-227679 Aaron Kim Fri, 19 Dec 2008 19:15:59 +0000 http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/?p=2248#comment-227679 Hey Naumi, I suspect you would see a slightly better correlation if you can get data on average house sizes. Also, cell phone adoption rates and device sophistication are likely driven also by other factors such as landline infrastructure, network technology, disposable income and demographics. Not sure if you've seen the TED Talk video with Malcolm Gladwell talking about spaghetti sauce. There's an interesting story there about plotting results and trying to find an explanation when dots are all over the place. Hey Naumi,

I suspect you would see a slightly better correlation if you can get data on average house sizes. Also, cell phone adoption rates and device sophistication are likely driven also by other factors such as landline infrastructure, network technology, disposable income and demographics. Not sure if you’ve seen the TED Talk video with Malcolm Gladwell talking about spaghetti sauce. There’s an interesting story there about plotting results and trying to find an explanation when dots are all over the place.

]]> By: Naumi Haque http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2008/12/15/the-smaller-your-home-the-cooler-your-phone/comment-page-1/#comment-226182 Naumi Haque Tue, 16 Dec 2008 04:07:15 +0000 http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/?p=2248#comment-226182 Engineer, thanks for the critical eye - you're absolutely right, the data could be read either way to prove or disprove the hypothesis. However, there are some compelling examples that do fit the model. Specifically, I think the Americas compared to Europe is an interesting dynamic. Canada, Mexico, and the United States all have low density and low adoption. European countries, by comparison, all have a higher population density and higher mobile penetration as well. <strong>Country.............Pop/km2..........Mobile Index</strong> Netherlands.....................395.................101 United Kingdom...............246.................106 Germany..........................232..................92 Italy..................................193..................117 Switzerland......................176..................90 Czech Republic.................132..................111 Denmark..........................127..................98 Portugal...........................114..................109 France..............................110...................77 Spain..................................89....................99 Mexico...............................53....................45 United States....................31.....................72 Canada................................3......................52 Like I said, it's by no means scientific, just an interesting conversation starter. For a proper comparison, I think you'd also have to look at the percentage of the population that lives in high-density areas versus low-density areas within each country. In the end, perhaps it just comes down to an urban versus rural argument. Engineer, thanks for the critical eye – you’re absolutely right, the data could be read either way to prove or disprove the hypothesis. However, there are some compelling examples that do fit the model. Specifically, I think the Americas compared to Europe is an interesting dynamic. Canada, Mexico, and the United States all have low density and low adoption. European countries, by comparison, all have a higher population density and higher mobile penetration as well.

Country………….Pop/km2……….Mobile Index
Netherlands…………………395……………..101
United Kingdom……………246……………..106
Germany……………………..232………………92
Italy…………………………….193………………117
Switzerland………………….176………………90
Czech Republic……………..132………………111
Denmark……………………..127………………98
Portugal………………………114………………109
France…………………………110……………….77
Spain…………………………….89………………..99
Mexico………………………….53………………..45
United States………………..31…………………72
Canada…………………………..3………………….52

Like I said, it’s by no means scientific, just an interesting conversation starter. For a proper comparison, I think you’d also have to look at the percentage of the population that lives in high-density areas versus low-density areas within each country. In the end, perhaps it just comes down to an urban versus rural argument.

]]> By: engineer http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2008/12/15/the-smaller-your-home-the-cooler-your-phone/comment-page-1/#comment-226155 engineer Tue, 16 Dec 2008 01:57:22 +0000 http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/?p=2248#comment-226155 I hate to be that guy, but I think your plot does more to disprove your hypothesis than it does to prove it. There doesn't really seem to be any trend there at all. I hate to be that guy, but I think your plot does more to disprove your hypothesis than it does to prove it.

There doesn’t really seem to be any trend there at all.

]]>