<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The wisdom of crowds vs. uniquely qualified minds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2008/11/06/the-wisdom-of-crowds-vs-uniquely-qualified-minds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2008/11/06/the-wisdom-of-crowds-vs-uniquely-qualified-minds/</link>
	<description>Exploring How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2011 14:21:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: allan wallace</title>
		<link>http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2008/11/06/the-wisdom-of-crowds-vs-uniquely-qualified-minds/comment-page-1/#comment-294432</link>
		<dc:creator>allan wallace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 00:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/?p=2140#comment-294432</guid>
		<description>If you can attract &quot;the best, uniquely qualified minds in the world&quot; you can accomplish almost anything. The trick seems to be first becoming *the most uniquely exceptional, collaborative resource in the world.*

Shall we start?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you can attract &#8220;the best, uniquely qualified minds in the world&#8221; you can accomplish almost anything. The trick seems to be first becoming *the most uniquely exceptional, collaborative resource in the world.*</p>
<p>Shall we start?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ¿Cómo haremos para desaparecer? &#187; Inteligencia colectiva y Open Innovation</title>
		<link>http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2008/11/06/the-wisdom-of-crowds-vs-uniquely-qualified-minds/comment-page-1/#comment-223289</link>
		<dc:creator>¿Cómo haremos para desaparecer? &#187; Inteligencia colectiva y Open Innovation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 14:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/?p=2140#comment-223289</guid>
		<description>[...] con acierto que en ambos casos, concurso y colección, el objetivo perseguido es atraer a &#8220;the best uniquely qualified minds in the world&#8220;. Esto es, no se trata de iniciativas para crear desde el conjunto sino para explicitar lo [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] con acierto que en ambos casos, concurso y colección, el objetivo perseguido es atraer a &#8220;the best uniquely qualified minds in the world&#8220;. Esto es, no se trata de iniciativas para crear desde el conjunto sino para explicitar lo [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wikinomics &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Reference Extract: Just like Google, if all Google&#8217;s results were decided by librarians</title>
		<link>http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2008/11/06/the-wisdom-of-crowds-vs-uniquely-qualified-minds/comment-page-1/#comment-205193</link>
		<dc:creator>Wikinomics &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Reference Extract: Just like Google, if all Google&#8217;s results were decided by librarians</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 03:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/?p=2140#comment-205193</guid>
		<description>[...] 13th, 2008, 10:33pm  Last week, Denis wrote an insightful post on the wisdom of crowds vs. uniquely qualified minds. In it, he argued [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 13th, 2008, 10:33pm  Last week, Denis wrote an insightful post on the wisdom of crowds vs. uniquely qualified minds. In it, he argued [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Crites</title>
		<link>http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2008/11/06/the-wisdom-of-crowds-vs-uniquely-qualified-minds/comment-page-1/#comment-202246</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Crites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 18:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/?p=2140#comment-202246</guid>
		<description>Great post, great thoughts on the diffence between collaboration using Crowdsourcing and Crowdcasting.  I compare open innovation crowdsourcing to fishing in the open sea for ideas and solutions.  Crowdcasting (also called narrowcasting) - tapping Uniquely Qualified Minds in this case - is like fishing in a stocked pond.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, great thoughts on the diffence between collaboration using Crowdsourcing and Crowdcasting.  I compare open innovation crowdsourcing to fishing in the open sea for ideas and solutions.  Crowdcasting (also called narrowcasting) &#8211; tapping Uniquely Qualified Minds in this case &#8211; is like fishing in a stocked pond.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luc Gendron</title>
		<link>http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2008/11/06/the-wisdom-of-crowds-vs-uniquely-qualified-minds/comment-page-1/#comment-202233</link>
		<dc:creator>Luc Gendron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 18:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/?p=2140#comment-202233</guid>
		<description>Denis, you&#039;re touching a sensitive point on co-creation environment durability and synergy.  I&#039;m passionnate about this challenge for quite a while.  

Besides increasing credibility and exposure of the &quot;uniquely qualified minds&quot;, there is two aspects to consider in term of contribution R.O.I.:  Web environment&#039;s operation revenues and asset value.  Contributors should be able to become more partners of this Web environment than just cheap labor for the one(s) who initiated it.

I believe the model which will be able to adress both will attrack those &quot;uniquely qualified minds&quot; for a longer period of time and keep refreshing the synergy and this famous &quot;wisdom of crowds&quot;.

I have something in mind that I would like to test if I can find the right partners.  I&#039;ll let you know if I succeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Denis, you&#8217;re touching a sensitive point on co-creation environment durability and synergy.  I&#8217;m passionnate about this challenge for quite a while.  </p>
<p>Besides increasing credibility and exposure of the &#8220;uniquely qualified minds&#8221;, there is two aspects to consider in term of contribution R.O.I.:  Web environment&#8217;s operation revenues and asset value.  Contributors should be able to become more partners of this Web environment than just cheap labor for the one(s) who initiated it.</p>
<p>I believe the model which will be able to adress both will attrack those &#8220;uniquely qualified minds&#8221; for a longer period of time and keep refreshing the synergy and this famous &#8220;wisdom of crowds&#8221;.</p>
<p>I have something in mind that I would like to test if I can find the right partners.  I&#8217;ll let you know if I succeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

