Business - Written by Denis Hancock on Monday, November 3, 2008 10:18 - 2 Comments
MySpace and MTV’s video monetization strategy: why can’t prosumers get a share?
As the LA Times reported today (along with approximately 169 other sources), MTV, MySpace, and Auditude are joining forces to develop a monetization strategy for streaming online videos. The process is quite straightforward – Auditude has indexed over one billion minutes of “professional” content, including 250 million videos and four years worth of television from 100 different channels. When a user uploads a video containing any of this content, the technology recognizes it. In turn, advertising is added to the video in one way or another, and the revenue can be shared between the content creator (i.e. the owner of the IP) and the distribution platform.
Auditude explains how their technology will work as follows:
The new platform will automatically identify any uploaded video clips from a number of shows produced by MTV Networks (including my personal favorite “The Daily Show”), and will display an overlay when the clip is played that shows which episode the clip originally came from, its original air-date, and links to online stores where users can buy the entire episode. In the past it has been nearly impossible to effectively monetize user-uploaded videos because they are typically tagged with such informative titles as “REally cool!” and “hilarious”. The Auditude platform ignores this information, relying solely on fingerprints taken from the clip’s audio and video data. These fingerprints are matched to prints in Auditude’s massive database, which spans over 250 million videos and 4 years of television content, all sorted by show and airdate.
As the LA Times article notes, this is a distinct improvement from the old mindset of Let’s sue YouTube (or other video distribution platform) and block this. In the words of Auditude CEO Vance Ikezoye:
“The first stage was clearly more focused on ‘How do I protect my content as a copyright holder and how do I keep from being sued as a site publisher? The stage we are entering now is much more about openness to try new business models to try to monetize the content.”
To quote Jeff Berman, the President of sales and marketing at MySpace:
“This is a game-changer. We’re going from a world of no to a world of yes while protecting the rights of the copyright holder.”
While I agree this is good progress towards a wikinomics enabled business model, it’s notable that the plans make no mention of sharing ad revenue with the individuals that upload the content – i.e. the prosumers. That would be the real game changer to me – while not suing people anymore is a nice start, giving prosumers an economic incentive to help distribute the content, particularly if they are adding value to it in some way (a mash up, for example), could unleas a wave of innovation. It also wouldn’t be that hard to do – it just involves a slightly different split of the revenue, mimicing what the likes of YouTube are already doing with “pure” user-generated content.
2 Comments
Joe W
Monetizing MySpace » MySpace’s new video monetization strategy
[...] clipped from http://www.wikinomics.com [...]
Leave a Reply
Browse Content
- Car 2.0 - How a community builds a car
- Self-destructing data: The return of Internet privacy
- The iPhone, growing up digital, and my daughter's education
- The dangers of GeoTweeting: PleaseRobMe.com
- Playbor: When work and fun coincide
- Lessons in collaboration from B.B. King’s
- A decade of frustration ahead?
- Games, user experience, and retroactive Continuity--All enabled by platforms
- Survey: How prepared is the enterprise to lead in the age of unbounded data?
- When you ask customers to dance, let them lead
- Real world examples for collaboration ROI
- Will You Use Target’s Mobile Coupons?
- Lessons in collaboration from B.B. King’s
- Games, user experience, and retroactive Continuity–All enabled by platforms
- Survey: How prepared is the enterprise to lead in the age of unbounded data?
- A decade of frustration ahead?
- The iPhone, growing up digital, and my daughter’s education
- Real world examples for collaboration ROI
- Playbor: When work and fun coincide
- Security, security, security…
- When you ask customers to dance, let them lead
- Car 2.0 – How a community builds a car
- Good post Naumi,
I like how you relate the jazz band performance to customer ...
- Hi Marilyn,
Thanks for the quote! I agree that some of the most interesting...
- Hi Friends H r u? I hope all is well...This is very true! Most gamers I know hav...
- Wonderful rich thought provoking analogies and a re quote of a favourite quote f...
- Whitney,
Thanks, I will. Check out this post from me http://www.wikinomics.com...
- Online business games is really a very difficult thing to understand... But ofco...
- I recommend reading Cass Sunstein's Republic.com 2.0. Although the book really ...
- If only people spent the amount of time they do playing games like Farmville on ...
Business - Mar 11, 2010 8:56 - 0 Comments
Will You Use Target’s Mobile Coupons?
More In Business
- Games, user experience, and retroactive Continuity–All enabled by platforms
- Survey: How prepared is the enterprise to lead in the age of unbounded data?
- Real world examples for collaboration ROI
- When you ask customers to dance, let them lead
- Car 2.0 – How a community builds a car
Entertainment - Mar 9, 2010 16:58 - 3 Comments
Lessons in collaboration from B.B. King’s
More In Entertainment
- CL!CK – LEGO’s fun social product development platform
- Peer Pressure 2.0: Farmville
- Online gaming more than just fun
- The NFL – The most protective league, attempting to control the uncontrollable
- The rise of computational photography and the birth of camera 2.0
Government, Society - Mar 5, 2010 6:01 - 2 Comments
A decade of frustration ahead?
More In Society
- The iPhone, growing up digital, and my daughter’s education
- Playbor: When work and fun coincide
- Security, security, security…
- The dangers of GeoTweeting: PleaseRobMe.com
- Self-destructing data: The return of Internet privacy


It’d be interesting to see who gets the revenue when clips from several shows are included in one video.