sex on webcam

sex cam to cam

sex on web cam

sex shows

cam private

sex chat

sex webcam

sex on webcam

Girls Cam

cams live

Business - Written by on Sunday, November 2, 2008 13:37 - 4 Comments

Jeff DeChambeau
Could Mass Collaboration Generate Life?

Kevin Kelly’s Lifestream is one of my favorite blogs. Earlier this week, Mr. Kelly wrote a post titled Evidence of a Global SuperOrganism, in which he seriously entertains the idea that the Internet (working as a distributed brain) with cloud-based software (roughly analogous to the mind) could develop into a self-aware, semi-autonomous superorganism.

Central to this development is an increased sense of autonomy from human interactions (such as self-repair, stabilizing feedback loops, and self-directed traffic management) and “smartness,”  — something that already exists in an ever-increasing form in the computational clouds of Google and Amazon, which are constantly learning about how it is that we use language, and form an understanding about how collective human behavior can be used to anticipate the actions of an individual.

These two systems are able to “manufacture intelligence” and sell it to the humans that participate in the system (by adding raw usage-information that these clouds use to refine their understanding). This money is then invested by the curators of the cloud to expand its computational power and scope, and the organism grows. While it seems like there’s an intentional blurring of the line between the hardware/software itself, and the companies that use them to deliver the services, I think it’s fair to respond that a corporation is a fairly abstract entity, and if Google were able to do it’s job of organizing the world’s information and making it universally accessible and useful with fewer employees and more computing power, its shareholders wouldn’t mind so long as the share price continued to rise. So such an organism could be viable as a company.

The final phase of the development towards something lifelike (or maybe even alive) would be self awareness, in which the Internet could map itselfs to determine whether the information it’s delivering comes form within or from without.

All of this, I suspect and hope, is still a few years away. So we don’t yet need upper-year university ethics courses on the proper and just treatment of packets and subroutines, but I find it gives a new perspective to my everyday internet-habits if I assume that each search I make, and every book I buy online, could be contributing, to an infinitessimal degree, to the creation and emergence of a new form of life; and that this process is happening in a surprisingly innocuous and organic way.



4 Comments

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

Alan
Nov 4, 2008 13:03

Talk about emergent collective intelligence! Very cool.

Hailin Yang
Nov 5, 2008 2:21

as a college student in china, the new trend of commercial on-line as well as the interconnection with people worldwide is getting closer and closer to young people in my nation. The willingness to establish a worldwide community focusing on both sharing and inspiring knowledges is getting stronger. I really appreciate the point of forming a organic community and a ecosystem of economy. However, such a fantastic opinion can not be made possible without a mature understanding of certain topics or a plenty supply of money.
Certain topics like what exactly a organism of corporation is and how to make that happen are so subtle and increasing attention along with more efforts should be made. And I believe that can and will, definitely, be the future of our world.

Wikinomics » Blog Archive » A quick follow up…
Nov 7, 2008 1:23

[...] 7th, 2008, 01:23am On the post I wrote last week about Kevin Kelly’s theory about the web as an emergent organism. I was cruising TED this evening and came across a talk that Mr Kelly gave on the [...]

Eyal Sivan
Jan 4, 2009 23:57

I too was impressed by Kelly’s post on the subject, as well as his follow-ups.

However, I feel that trying to measure our own superorganism based on “smartness” is ultimately impossible. I believe that an approach based on measuring our own social complexity is much more practical and measurable, as well as being more honest about the ideological implications of joining a superorganism.

My full response can be found at here at my blog, The Connective.

Coming soon in paperback! Help rename the paperback version of Macrowikinomics and win a one-hour webinar for you and your colleagues with Don Tapscott. Ends 5:00pm ET, August 31. Learn more.

Business - Oct 5, 2010 12:00 - 0 Comments

DRM and us

More In Business


Entertainment - Aug 3, 2010 13:14 - 2 Comments

Want to see the future? Look to the games

More In Entertainment


Society - Aug 6, 2010 8:19 - 4 Comments

The Empire strikes a light

More In Society