Business - Written by Naumi Haque on Sunday, October 12, 2008 18:11 - 4 Comments
Gaming the multi-party electoral system
We’ve been talking a lot about the Webification of the Obama campaign, but there are also some interesting things going on in our own backyard. As Canadians gear up for our own Federal election this week, Vote for Environment – a pro-environment lobby group – is looking to use Internet-enabled, grassroots organization to try and game Canada’s multi-party political system.
The initiative is appealing to those that believe the environment is the single most important issue. It paints the Harper government as the anti-environment party, and then specifically targets 39 ridings where the Conservative party won in the last election by less than 10%. Visitors can search for their riding and are given recommendations on who to vote for based on poll data. The goal is to consolidate the vote around the party that was the runner up; regardless of who that might be.
The video on the site explains:
“To vote for the environment we need to beyond political affiliation; we need to vote to win. [...] If those of us who care about the environment don’t vote across party lines, the pro-environment vote will be split as it was in the last election and Harper will be re-elected. [...] We are the majority, but our electoral system hasn’t kept up with Canada’s changing political landscape. [...] Grassroots cooperation will mean that all pro-environment parties will win more seats. [...] By working together the pro-environment majority can win.”

This only works in multi-party systems, so it’s not applicable in the U.S., but I think it’s a great example of how grassroots movements can be emboldened by the Internet. Don is always saying how the environment is “the first truly global cause.” If that’s true, this is the type of non-partisan, grassroots collaboration that we’re going to need on a global scale.
4 Comments
Blockbuster y la cola larga (long tail) - Gedankenexperiment
Collaborative Socialutions . . . Where Does Collaboration Fit In? | socialutions
[...] and Williams, in their book Wikinomics, identified four steps to developing a collaborative [...]
Naumi Haque
Should have read my colleagues’ posts before posting. Dan also talks about this and other initiatives here: http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2008/10/07/more-on-voting-and-technology/
Open innovation in bank service (and some thought on design) « nicomorelli
[...] Paul Artiuch noticed some time ago on the Wikinomics blog, social lending is not new, as people got along without [...]
Business - Oct 5, 2010 12:00 - 0 Comments
DRM and us
More In Business
- Facebook, Facebook, Facebook
- Survey: How are you using Facebook, Twitter, smart phones, and other technology platforms?
- Will Facebook be your CRM provider?
- Wiki Banking
- The importance of being competent
Entertainment - Aug 3, 2010 13:14 - 2 Comments
Want to see the future? Look to the games
More In Entertainment
- Lessons in collaboration from B.B. King’s
- CL!CK – LEGO’s fun social product development platform
- Peer Pressure 2.0: Farmville
- Online gaming more than just fun
- The NFL – The most protective league, attempting to control the uncontrollable
Society - Aug 6, 2010 8:19 - 4 Comments
The Empire strikes a light
More In Society
- Balance: customer receptivity vs. customer revulsion
- The Net Gen: Too plugged-in for parenting?
- Are you addicted to social media?
- The privacy discussion we need to have
- “The Data-Driven Life”: Who’s not interested in discovery?

Coming soon in paperback! Help rename the paperback version of Macrowikinomics and win a one-hour webinar for you and your colleagues with Don Tapscott. Ends 5:00pm ET, August 31.
[...] último, en Wikinomics, Naumi Haque plantea: Chances are my kids will never know what a video rental store is; at least not in the traditional [...]