This is Gloucester, a UK based blog, is reporting that the Government Communications Headquarters is pitching a plan that would allow it to monitor all SMS and email messages sent and recieved in the UK. The plan, slated to cost English taxpayers a potential $12bn, would be the country’s largest surveillance program, and adds another data point to the security vs. privacy debate.

As Michael Geist wrote last week, the Internet has become a system that never forgets anything, and there are more and more tools that allow people to mine information from the darkest corners of the Internet. That’s become a fact of life, but it’s to be expected: people are participating in a digital medium, with full understanding that data storage is cheap and archives are plentiful, so chances are good that the things they say will be on hand, somewhere, for the foreseeable life of the Internet.

So, are email and sms messages, like public discussions, simply part of a technology that is inherently tracable, or given the targeted nature of email and sms, are they granted a special class of privacy from the rest of the bits that float bout the ‘tubes?

I’m not sure how the average citizen in the UK would feel about their own tax dollars being used to breach their privacy, but it could be a concession that people are prepared to make for their “national security.” This paricular instance aside, it seems as though the reliability and security of connections is becoming less and less trustworthy, so the honus for protection of data is being placed on end users — maybe it’s time for us all to generate some PGP private keys!