Business - Written by Guest Blogger on Tuesday, August 26, 2008 17:42 - 2 Comments
When Social Networking Won’t Work
Editor’s Note: Brennan Direnfeld is a staff accountant working in Toronto. He blogs at Pathetically Awesome on topics such as exercising, books, accounting and other things he finds interesting on the Internet. Today he explores instances where companies used Web 2.0 as strategies themselves, instead as of tools best tailored to specific situations. An expanded version of this post can be read here.
Tools vs. Strategy
Web 2.0 and social networking are tools, they are not strategies. Companies need to realize that social networks are not Internet panaceas:
Networks work best under two conditions. First, they must allow people to make sincere connections with one another. Faking this sincerity can alienate users, reducing the value a social network can create. And second, they must adhere to the cultures already in place. This means you can’t take an existing corporate culture and shimmy it into any social network, as Blue Collar Comedy and Deloitte have learned:
- Blue Collar Comedy
The execs at funny or die mistook their format for their strategy when trying to promote Blue Collar Comedy. I guess management thought “funny or die + blue collar comedy = money.” But it’s not that simple, considering that the site was taken down. The demographic that blue collar comedy targets, is not the same group of Internet savvy 20 somethings who make funny or die successful. The site was destined to fail. - D Street
The opportunities at Deloitte are great, but the hours can get intense. People have been expressing this sentiment at urbandictionary.com like this.Running parallel to this problem is the fact that most employees use an external network called Green Dot Life to connect with each other. To deal with these issues Deloitte created D Street – a social networking application – in an attempt to internalize both problems. You can get some background on D Street here. It’s easy to tell when someone doesn’t have a clear strategy because they will compensate with a lot of buzzwords – i.e. virtual teams, or cross-division collaboration. These phrases resemble the fluff I tried to pass off as “answers” on my second year H/R exam.
The power of social networks can benefit anyone who participates in interpersonal relationships, but the way that those soon-to-be-networkers will connect to one another can’t be addressed with a cookie cutter solution. Instead, the tools that make up the web 2.0 shift need to be tailored to specific communities. Hopefully, examples of social networking failure, like the above, will become fewer in the future.
2 Comments
Are you suggesting that professional connections externally through urbandictionary.com are more real than Deloitte’s D Street? Connections on many external sites are often artificial. In my opinion, annonomity dilutes the connection. Organizations like Deloitte that encourage REAL connections with REAL people through their social networking tool D Street allow every employee and community in the organization to benefit. Deloitte did not try to shimmy their culture into D Street. Instead, they are evolving their culture through D Street and the communities that comprise it.
When a large organization reaches the point where Facebook and LinkedIn know more about their employees than they do, they need to develop a way to build connections internally. The average age of the Deloitte employee is 28 years old. We used the platform that the younger professionals feel most comfortable. Nothing wrong with that at all, right? What makes you think that because we used 2.0 technologies it was a cookie cutter approach?
Of course Deloitte is new at this… Everyone is. But in just 10 months, D Street has become a very popular application at Deloitte. To date, 75% of the firm has visited D Street at least once. In September, D Street averaged over 550 visitors a day. 85% of them were repeat visitors. With 15,000 active profiles, 1,000 active blogs, 30,000 photos, 6,000 resumes and over 350 communities, D Street is evolving to be the place to connect. Have we perfected it yet? Nope. But we sure are trying…..
Business - Oct 5, 2010 12:00 - 0 Comments
DRM and us
More In Business
- Facebook, Facebook, Facebook
- Survey: How are you using Facebook, Twitter, smart phones, and other technology platforms?
- Will Facebook be your CRM provider?
- Wiki Banking
- The importance of being competent
Entertainment - Aug 3, 2010 13:14 - 2 Comments
Want to see the future? Look to the games
More In Entertainment
- Lessons in collaboration from B.B. King’s
- CL!CK – LEGO’s fun social product development platform
- Peer Pressure 2.0: Farmville
- Online gaming more than just fun
- The NFL – The most protective league, attempting to control the uncontrollable
Society - Aug 6, 2010 8:19 - 4 Comments
The Empire strikes a light
More In Society
- Balance: customer receptivity vs. customer revulsion
- The Net Gen: Too plugged-in for parenting?
- Are you addicted to social media?
- The privacy discussion we need to have
- “The Data-Driven Life”: Who’s not interested in discovery?

Coming soon in paperback! Help rename the paperback version of Macrowikinomics and win a one-hour webinar for you and your colleagues with Don Tapscott. Ends 5:00pm ET, August 31.
Nice post…I like your statement: “Web 2.0 and social networking are tools, they are not strategies”.
We advise all our customer to first monitor the conversation and build knowledge and wisdom on this conversation before building a strategy to participate.
This will help them to understand which tools, social media and tone is appropriate for the conversation they are entering.
Just being on Facebook or Youtube is not a strategy, it is one piece of your overall social media marketing strategy.