irish american dating

aldut friend finder

cuban mail order brides

girl online dating

online match dating

ny swinger

temple singles

whore girls

www2 livejasmin com

sex singles

swinging pictures

match maker agency

online date chatting

single parent personal

www swinglifestyles com

chat with hot women

single travel tours

la excorts

single women australia

local sex partners

download free match making software

oral sex woman

lonely ladies

cheatinghousewifes com

outcall san diego

european singles

dating gay men

australian dating site

gratis sexdating

sexclassifieds

sex swinging

herpes free dating

top dating sites

friend finder network

lesbian chat cam

date japanese women

baptist dating service

swinger illinois

fall river singles

singles new jersey

key singles

swing stock

sex chatt

sex ar

knox singles

escort latinas

match com commercial

mumbai dating sites

sexfriend

singles 265

matchmaker denver

for single

date asian women

chat room cybersex

indiacricketmatch

lifestyle swinging

in adult

poconos couples resorts

online dating advice for men

women who date

femdom vid

ult friend finder

florida singles dance

grande prairie singles

sex en direct

dogging in scotland

sexo swing

frinedfinder

south jersey singles

singles and couples

arizona swinger clubs

swinger community

discreet encounter

singles 2 sex

married but available

picture sex women

cheating wives cartoons

woman dating

christian singles free

sexual older women

swing clubs new york

free dating in uk

singles birmingham

sex partners online

rencontre chaude

swinger dating

singles vancouver bc

personals bi

best internet dating services

best japanese sex

one night stand in

single parents government

web sex chat

online dating comparisons

date chats

date for women

all sex websites

swinger sites uk

escort book

couple libertin

Business - Written by on Monday, August 25, 2008 19:22 - 0 Comments

Naumi Haque
Mass collaboration pop quiz

At our June conference in Boston, CEO and founder of Legal OnRamp Paul Lippe started his presentation with a little pop quiz. Without stealing too much of his thunder, I thought I’d post one of the more interesting questions from his deck:

“Name a comprehensive information resource, written by random people and commentators all over the world (the #1 contributor was condemned as insane), that is only distributed online?”

Click through to find out the answer.

Many of you might have guessed Wikipedia – the correct answer is The Oxford English Dictionary (OED). However, there are striking similarities between the two. Both used mass collaboration to amass millions of submissions, albeit mass collaboration was a lot different back in the late 1800’s when the Dictionary was being written.

The OED project started in 1858 and was completed (i.e. the first edition printed) in 1928 – in total, a seventy-year project. During the height of the collaborative process, over 800 volunteers were submitting 1,000 quotation slips by mail on a daily basis, and by 1882, there were more than 3,500,000 submissions.

Interesting factoid: the number-one contributor, Dr. W.C. Minor, was a convicted murderer and spent the better part of his life in a lunatic asylum. I just recently finished an excellent book on the topic, “The Professor and the Madman: A Tale of Murder, Insanity, and the Making of The Oxford English Dictionary.”

In 1928, the entire First Edition of the OED was available as a set of 20 half-volumes. The price was 50 or 55 guineas (£52s or £57) depending on the format and binding. The dictionary covered 414,825 words backed by five million quotations, of which some two million were actually printed in the dictionary text. The OED’s latest (and last) print edition (Second Edition) was printed in 1989 and can currently be bought for £450 (note, the inflation-adjusted price means the dictionary costs about the same now as it did in 1928). From this point on, all updates and revisions are strictly available online.

By comparison, Wikipedia is a free resource. Started in 2001, it already has over 75,000 active contributors and as of today, there are 2,528,983 articles in English. If you were to plot the influence of technology on mass collaboration, the difference between the OED and Wikipedia would look something like this:



Comments are closed.

Coming soon in paperback! Help rename the paperback version of Macrowikinomics and win a one-hour webinar for you and your colleagues with Don Tapscott. Ends 5:00pm ET, August 31. Learn more.

Business - Oct 5, 2010 12:00 - 0 Comments

DRM and us

More In Business


Entertainment - Aug 3, 2010 13:14 - 2 Comments

Want to see the future? Look to the games

More In Entertainment


Society - Aug 6, 2010 8:19 - 4 Comments

The Empire strikes a light

More In Society