Business - Written by Ian Da Silva on Monday, August 18, 2008 22:31 - 2 Comments

Mygazine: Blatant infringement? Canary in the coal mine?

I suppose it was only a matter of time before something like this came along and I have been anxiously waiting to see how this one pans out.  Launched in July, on seemingly razor-thin legal ice, it appears that beta site mygazines is still alive and kicking (not to mention enjoying the spotlight gained from a widespread AP news release).

The site provides member-scanned full digital copies of magazines, which can be browsed, shared, archived and even re-assembled to create aptly-named “mygazines”.  The site is hosted by Stokholm-based PRQ, “the world’s least lawyer-friendly hosting company“, which is also host to (and owned by two founders of) well-known bittorrent tracker, The Pirate Bay.

Interestingly, the site tour appears to be targeted at publishers, pitching itself as multi-faceted growth opportunity,  but most industry leaders asked aren’t exactly jumping at the “opportunity”.

Why should I upload my publication to mygazines.com?
  • Our article-level search and archiving ability allows your audience to find the content they’re looking for faster
  • Increase your distribution and advertising revenue by exposing your publication to more eyes
  • Keep control of your publication: Mygazines will not allow for downloading or printing of your publication. Your original source file is never accessible.
  • Save the trees – no paper will be used in the making of your virtual publication  
  • It’s absolutely free!
  • Wow.  A paper-saving, “distribution” and advertising revenue-increasing model that is also reader-friendly, allowing for customized content…seems like a no-brainer, right?  Well, not so fast.  Despite the site’s sugar-coating, the proclaimed “benefits” do not accrue to a publisher whose member-uploaded content becomes hosted on the third-party site. (Even if hyperlinks on advertisements are provided, the content is not tied to the original publisher.)

    I must admit, I see both sides of the coin on this one.  Will this be a push towards open-content release or a short-lived copyright casualty?

    In other copyright news, well-known Canadian law professor and fair copyright crusader, Michael Geist, has launched a campaign entitled c61in61seconds, where citizens are challenged to submit their reactions to Canada’s heavily-debated amendment to the Copyright Law, Bill C-61, in a YouTube video of 61 seconds or less.  The campaign has yet to gain full traction, but be sure to check it out and submit your 61 cents if you’ve got an opinion.



    2 Comments

    You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

    Mike Dover
    Aug 19, 2008 0:18

    Great post, Ian.

    I was thinking of blogging on this myself (that ain’t going to help your next performance review)

    Good discussion on this issue at the Law Blog on the Wall St. Journal today.

    Mygazine has their servers in lawsuit-friendly countries and the owner of the URL is “John Smith”.

    I’m not sure if he lives at 123 Main St.

    "Pirate hunting" season everywhere | Daniel.Hjelmtorp.com
    Aug 21, 2008 7:54

    [...] of its money from advertisement, the more people reading, the better for advertisers. There are many more great advantages with this model. The technology is already developed. The work of scanning and editing the pages are [...]

    Leave a Reply

    Comment

    Browse Content

    Business - Mar 19, 2010 16:57 - 0 Comments

    Addressing the social media ‘support gap’

    More In Business


    Entertainment - Mar 9, 2010 16:58 - 3 Comments

    Lessons in collaboration from B.B. King’s

    More In Entertainment


    Society - Mar 17, 2010 9:45 - 0 Comments

    On unintended consequences

    More In Society