sex web camera

cam private

cam sex

sex webcam

sex on webcam

webcams

lesbian webcams

live sex

sex cam

sex on web cam

Business - Written by on Thursday, June 26, 2008 10:46 - 5 Comments

Jeff DeChambeau
Good Idea, Bad Execution

Wikipedia spends a lot of time paring down business articles because they read more like advertisements than encyclopedic articles. That’s fair — so why not have a wiki for businesses and consumers to work on together, blending what businesses think of themselves with the opinions of consumers? Such a wiki does exist, though it’s still very small: WikiCommerce.

Some of the articles are fairly good, others, not so much.

The problem is that WikiCommerce isn’t doing a great job actually using open, wiki principles. A friend of the blog, Jim Hedger, tipped us off that WikiCommerce has been spamming him — that’s a pretty big offense. Jim’s colleague then made a new page on the WikiCommerce wiki, appropriately titled “spam.” The current version of the page shows no history of this, but the version history is a little more telling, on the left is the old, on the right is the current:

wikicommerce.png

Protip: when your website/business is built on a platform that is fundamentally built on openness — and not just openness, but openness in users and businesses talking about commerce — you probably shouldn’t use your platform to censor your users for using your site exactly how you asked them to.



5 Comments

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

Mike Dover
Jun 26, 2008 11:59

And to be 100% clear…

Wikicommerce is in no way connected to the Wikinomics team.

But, we’re always here to give an opinion on it.

Scott Van Achte
Jun 26, 2008 12:51

I am the one who pointed out to Jim that I had been receiving WikiCommerce’s Spam. (In all cases its the same spam from the same sender – and in most cases, a simple “block sender” would do the trick, but for some reason this one annoyed me which is why I added that (now edited SPAM page).

For a site that focuses on user involvement, they should be careful who they SPAM. Someone just may edit their about page…

(In a case where they are just hoping to get a little link bait, I hope your link to them up top is a rel=”nofollow”!)

Jeff DeChambeau
Jun 26, 2008 12:54

Good lookin’ about page, Scott.

They’re welcome to know that we’re sending people to their site, and hopefully they’ll get the point that they’re missing the point of wikis.

jim hedger
Jun 26, 2008 13:03

nice call on the NOFOLLOW attribute Scott.

Jeff DeChambeau
Jun 26, 2008 13:14

Links updated. I got mixed up and thought that nofollow would strip the referrer info.

Coming soon in paperback! Help rename the paperback version of Macrowikinomics and win a one-hour webinar for you and your colleagues with Don Tapscott. Ends 5:00pm ET, August 31. Learn more.

Business - Oct 5, 2010 12:00 - 0 Comments

DRM and us

More In Business


Entertainment - Aug 3, 2010 13:14 - 2 Comments

Want to see the future? Look to the games

More In Entertainment


Society - Aug 6, 2010 8:19 - 4 Comments

The Empire strikes a light

More In Society