Business - Written by Komail Mithani on Monday, June 16, 2008 16:34 - 2 Comments
World War 2.0
Web 2.0 enables people to collaborate without regard to boundaries to engage innovation and creativity. But, some people tend to forget about hackers, who are also part of the Web 2.0 sphere and when they have the ability to collaborate, security begins to become a large issue. Wired Science published by PBS, reported on an attack on the Estonian network. The video takes a look at how Russian hackers collaborated to create a botnet that disabled banks, newspapers, and some government ministries.
An interesting part of the report highlighted Estonian’s Internet Defense Team that ultimately combated against the hackers to bring everything back to normal. Throughout the video, I was consistently reminding of Die Hard 4 where a ‘fire sale’ (an attack against the entire digital infrastructure of a country) created mass chaos for the entire country.
This is an issue I believe many companies should take seriously as well as governments. After watching this video, I pose this question for all you Wikinomics innovators: with the emergence of Web 2.0, how has the security issue risen for globalized companies to insure their systems aren’t affected? Should their be a greater push for governments to implement Internet defense strategies in case of the Estonia-like event?
2 Comments
Wikinomics » Blog Archive » Should the Government Regulate the Internet?
[...] I know that this is my second post about security (my first one covered internet infrastructure in Estonia but I believe it should be spread across the blogosphere. How can a parent sink so low to use a [...]
Business - Oct 5, 2010 12:00 - 0 Comments
DRM and us
More In Business
- Facebook, Facebook, Facebook
- Survey: How are you using Facebook, Twitter, smart phones, and other technology platforms?
- Will Facebook be your CRM provider?
- Wiki Banking
- The importance of being competent
Entertainment - Aug 3, 2010 13:14 - 2 Comments
Want to see the future? Look to the games
More In Entertainment
- Lessons in collaboration from B.B. King’s
- CL!CK – LEGO’s fun social product development platform
- Peer Pressure 2.0: Farmville
- Online gaming more than just fun
- The NFL – The most protective league, attempting to control the uncontrollable
Society - Aug 6, 2010 8:19 - 4 Comments
The Empire strikes a light
More In Society
- Balance: customer receptivity vs. customer revulsion
- The Net Gen: Too plugged-in for parenting?
- Are you addicted to social media?
- The privacy discussion we need to have
- “The Data-Driven Life”: Who’s not interested in discovery?

Coming soon in paperback! Help rename the paperback version of Macrowikinomics and win a one-hour webinar for you and your colleagues with Don Tapscott. Ends 5:00pm ET, August 31.
In a way, there is nothing ’2.0′ about this particular theme. The original DARPANET distributed architecture came out of defense concerns, remember?
Technologically speaking, overall I trust the architecture of the Internet to recover from just about any software attack. It may temporarily get broken into local pieces, but it has much of what IBM calls autonomic computing characteristics like self-diagnosis and self-healing.
That isn’t to say serious disruption couldn’t be caused in the short term.
The truly interesting scenario isn’t hackers, but the Net’s own evolution. Not to a Skynet/Matrix like ‘takeover’ creature, but becoming too complex for us to control, and susceptible to its own uber-complex failure modes, including death. This is related to the singularity idea some AI folks like Ray Kurzweil like to talk about. There was an IEEE Spectrum issue about this recently.
Venkat