egyptian singles

native american personals

singles ny

men in uniform dating

tango personals phone

singles ukraine

online dating usa

tv ts personals

trinidad singles

website for dating

new house singles

dating free internet site

senior sex

clearwater singles

rencontre net

english dating

dallas online dating

sex meet

list of dating sites

springfield missouri singles

find sex dating

orlando personals

dating service australia

rencontre echangiste

freindfinder com

big chat rooms

live girls on web cam

modesto singles

chat room on line

free friendfinder

six hills singles

atlanta singles club

bars for singles

oline chat

ametuer web cam

irc singles

singles questions

lonelywivesclub

women for date

swinger vacations

men dating online

find sex friend

kelowna personals

odd couple tv dvd

gay singles cruise

lds friend finder

johnson city singles

hook up your myspace

cheap sex chat lines

wheelchair singles

dating spiritual

meet african women

for escord

local online chat

personals web site

single parent dating web site

naughty russian girls

100 free christian singles

encounters new york

older women seeking younger

dating online canada

russians girls com

us new singles

www photo personals co uk

russia woman

bendigo singles

jamaica swinger

uk dating scams

14 year old dating sites

adults friend finder

how to get laid today

find sex online

women seeking men in kerala

asian girl chat

freegirls

golf personals

www ladies com

divorced singles

adult is

single mothers dating

sexpartner ingyen

ukraine mail order brides

find singles near

singles clubs chicago

jamaican dating sites

mate intimate dating

sex chat sites

millionaire date

couple web cam

join friendfinder networks

best singles website

denver swinger clubs

canadian dating sites

sexcontacts

singles bar nyc

meet single females

swinging clubs west midlands

online dating miami

best place to live for singles

eharmony dating

Business - Written by on Monday, May 26, 2008 13:53 - 2 Comments

Naumi Haque
Getting past the ‘collaboration’ buzz word

It seems as though we’re labeling every type of cooperative activity as “collaboration” these days. Every company wants to be seen as collaborative and every enterprise solution wants to sell the benefits of collaboration. It’s gotten to the point where everything from Wikipedia, to polling your customers, to a simple conversation between co-workers is being dubbed as “collaboration.”

A recent report from the Economist Intelligence Unit suggests that adopting a broad definition for collaboration can be detrimental and can in fact detract from “true” collaborative efforts. The main focus of the report is the role of trust in enabling collaboration, but the opening section of the paper lays out a valuable framework for understanding the difference between collaboration, cooperation, and coordination.

From the report:

Research shows the term “collaboration” is used to cover the gamut—from projects designed to cut costs, increase efficiency and improve compliance to those involving working with outsiders to develop new products. Most often, collaboration is achieved through the use of early-21st Century technology to enable 20th Century processes. Collaboration is usually focused internally on producing derivatives of, or improvements in, existing activities. It is rarely seen as a total success.

While value can be derived from many different types of co-operative activities, the research suggests companies may be doing themselves a disservice by categorising every such initiative as collaboration.

In fact, the research indicates that companies might benefit from a more disciplined approach to defining and executing a collaboration strategy. Increased rigour could enable organisations to attain greater success and value from collaborative ventures—and better prepare them for the increased challenge of collaborating as the business environment becomes more globalised, communication becomes more virtualised, and the workforce absorbs an increasingly tech-savvy demographic.

collaboration-misnomer5.jpg

According to the study, the top three uses of true collaboration among large enterprises ($10 billion+ revenues) are: improving internal processes, increasing efficiency, and lowering costs. For small- and mid-sized companies (less than $500 million in revenues) the main focus areas of collaborative initiatives are: developing a new product, increasing sales, and improving customer service.

For the complete findings, read “The role of trust in business collaboration.”



2 Comments

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

No “i” in team but three different c’s in teamwork « Knowledge Futures
May 28, 2008 14:34

[...] collaboration is a bit deeper than cooperation. So I felt Ok about that view when looking at a recent post over at Wikinomics referring to differences between coordination, cooperation and collaboration. The figure that they [...]

Blog
May 31, 2010 4:42

[...] In the context of Web 2.0 buzzwords, perhaps collaboration has become one of the most overused buzzwords of them all. But as we break into Web 3.0 and beyond, it is clear that we must become more [...]

Coming soon in paperback! Help rename the paperback version of Macrowikinomics and win a one-hour webinar for you and your colleagues with Don Tapscott. Ends 5:00pm ET, August 31. Learn more.

Business - Oct 5, 2010 12:00 - 0 Comments

DRM and us

More In Business


Entertainment - Aug 3, 2010 13:14 - 2 Comments

Want to see the future? Look to the games

More In Entertainment


Society - Aug 6, 2010 8:19 - 4 Comments

The Empire strikes a light

More In Society