Business - Written by Naumi Haque on Monday, May 26, 2008 13:53 - 1 Comment
Getting past the ‘collaboration’ buzz word
It seems as though we’re labeling every type of cooperative activity as “collaboration” these days. Every company wants to be seen as collaborative and every enterprise solution wants to sell the benefits of collaboration. It’s gotten to the point where everything from Wikipedia, to polling your customers, to a simple conversation between co-workers is being dubbed as “collaboration.”
A recent report from the Economist Intelligence Unit suggests that adopting a broad definition for collaboration can be detrimental and can in fact detract from “true” collaborative efforts. The main focus of the report is the role of trust in enabling collaboration, but the opening section of the paper lays out a valuable framework for understanding the difference between collaboration, cooperation, and coordination.
From the report:
Research shows the term “collaboration” is used to cover the gamut—from projects designed to cut costs, increase efficiency and improve compliance to those involving working with outsiders to develop new products. Most often, collaboration is achieved through the use of early-21st Century technology to enable 20th Century processes. Collaboration is usually focused internally on producing derivatives of, or improvements in, existing activities. It is rarely seen as a total success.
While value can be derived from many different types of co-operative activities, the research suggests companies may be doing themselves a disservice by categorising every such initiative as collaboration.
In fact, the research indicates that companies might benefit from a more disciplined approach to defining and executing a collaboration strategy. Increased rigour could enable organisations to attain greater success and value from collaborative ventures—and better prepare them for the increased challenge of collaborating as the business environment becomes more globalised, communication becomes more virtualised, and the workforce absorbs an increasingly tech-savvy demographic.

According to the study, the top three uses of true collaboration among large enterprises ($10 billion+ revenues) are: improving internal processes, increasing efficiency, and lowering costs. For small- and mid-sized companies (less than $500 million in revenues) the main focus areas of collaborative initiatives are: developing a new product, increasing sales, and improving customer service.
For the complete findings, read “The role of trust in business collaboration.”
1 Comment
No “i” in team but three different c’s in teamwork « Knowledge Futures
Leave a Reply
Browse Content
- We can do better than just making work “less miserable”
- Carpong: Riding with your SMS on
- Real-world impact from virtual-world collaboration: Crisis Commons
- Would you rather own Yelp.com or Milo.com?
- Collaboration as competition. Microsoft decides to "collaborate".
- My top ten themes from 2010 Davos, part 1
- Helping Haiti - Social media doing its part
- What you need, when you need it: How context-aware machines will change how we access information
- Davos 2010: The World is Broken
- Canadians friend Democracy on facebook
- The open government directive: Ready, set, engage!
- Marketing on the cheap thanks to spontaneous (mainstream) internet culture
- Innovating the 21st-century university
- My top ten themes from 2010 Davos, part 2
- My top ten themes from 2010 Davos, part 1
- Analyzing the State of the Union: Speeches as data points
- Real-world impact from virtual-world collaboration: Crisis Commons
- Global problem solving? Stephen Harper defends the status quo
- Thinking about YouNoodle for the enterprise
- Davos: Nike and Partners Launch The GreenXchange
- CL!CK – LEGO’s Fun Social Product Development Platform
- Canadians friend Democracy on facebook
- Dana, here is where you can start: http://crisiscommons.org/. I don't see a Chic...
- Have something to say about Happiness? Visit www.wikiprogress.org ..... and for ...
- Based on my experience, I have a business a small restaurant and thanks to God u...
- As a follow up to this post, here's an insightful Op-Ed piece in the NYT from a ...
- Ben was my favorite Michael Jackson song and i kind...
- Good to hear this is being created. As an MBA student focusing on Sustainabilit...
- I love the "Girl Effect". The new millennium version of Girl Power!...
- Sounds like Davos rather than being an assembly of leaders taking a long term ou...
Business - Feb 7, 2010 22:25 - 0 Comments
Marketing on the cheap thanks to spontaneous (mainstream) internet culture
More In Business
- My top ten themes from 2010 Davos, part 2
- My top ten themes from 2010 Davos, part 1
- Thinking about YouNoodle for the enterprise
- Digitizing Davos
- Davos 2010: The World is Broken
Entertainment - Jan 28, 2010 11:38 - 0 Comments
CL!CK – LEGO’s Fun Social Product Development Platform
More In Entertainment
- Peer Pressure 2.0: Farmville
- Online gaming more than just fun
- The NFL – The most protective league, attempting to control the uncontrollable
- The rise of computational photography and the birth of camera 2.0
- Starting the comparison of NBA teams on Twitter
Society - Feb 4, 2010 16:47 - 0 Comments
Innovating the 21st-century university
More In Society
- My top ten themes from 2010 Davos, part 2
- Real-world impact from virtual-world collaboration: Crisis Commons
- Carpong: Riding with your SMS on
- The open government directive: Ready, set, engage!
- Helping Haiti – Social media doing its part


[...] collaboration is a bit deeper than cooperation. So I felt Ok about that view when looking at a recent post over at Wikinomics referring to differences between coordination, cooperation and collaboration. The figure that they [...]