<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An unlikely social (networking) success story</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2008/05/08/an-unlikely-social-networking-success-story/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2008/05/08/an-unlikely-social-networking-success-story/</link>
	<description>Exploring How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2011 14:21:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DH</title>
		<link>http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2008/05/08/an-unlikely-social-networking-success-story/comment-page-1/#comment-120394</link>
		<dc:creator>DH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 22:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2008/05/08/an-unlikely-social-networking-success-story/#comment-120394</guid>
		<description>For a more scientific approach to these metrics, I used Googlefight to analyze whether more people love or hate Walmart.

The results:

&quot;I love Walmart&quot; = 851,000
&quot;I hate Walmart&quot; = 585,000</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a more scientific approach to these metrics, I used Googlefight to analyze whether more people love or hate Walmart.</p>
<p>The results:</p>
<p>&#8220;I love Walmart&#8221; = 851,000<br />
&#8220;I hate Walmart&#8221; = 585,000</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Majer</title>
		<link>http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2008/05/08/an-unlikely-social-networking-success-story/comment-page-1/#comment-120375</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Majer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 20:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2008/05/08/an-unlikely-social-networking-success-story/#comment-120375</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s by no means scientific, but here&#039;s the number of results produced for google searches of several phrases related to Wal-Mart:
 9,120 &quot;I love Wal-Mart&quot;
 18,000 &quot;I hate Wal-Mart&quot;
 11,300 &quot;I love WalMart&quot;
 19,600 &quot;I hate WalMart&quot;

To be fair, there&#039;s also quite a few fans that &quot;like&quot; Wal-Mart too:
 3,780 &quot;I like Wal-Mart&quot;
 28,800 &quot;I like WalMart&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s by no means scientific, but here&#8217;s the number of results produced for google searches of several phrases related to Wal-Mart:<br />
 9,120 &#8220;I love Wal-Mart&#8221;<br />
 18,000 &#8220;I hate Wal-Mart&#8221;<br />
 11,300 &#8220;I love WalMart&#8221;<br />
 19,600 &#8220;I hate WalMart&#8221;</p>
<p>To be fair, there&#8217;s also quite a few fans that &#8220;like&#8221; Wal-Mart too:<br />
 3,780 &#8220;I like Wal-Mart&#8221;<br />
 28,800 &#8220;I like WalMart&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ming Kwan</title>
		<link>http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2008/05/08/an-unlikely-social-networking-success-story/comment-page-1/#comment-120368</link>
		<dc:creator>Ming Kwan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 20:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2008/05/08/an-unlikely-social-networking-success-story/#comment-120368</guid>
		<description>Ken, that&#039;s a fair point. But on the flip side, if someone was to write &quot;Wal-Mart, in general, is a very well-liked brand&quot; could equally be viewed as &quot;absurd&quot;.
I guess, what I should have written in my post to make it clear is that Wal-Mart, obviously does have fans; but in an online environment - doesn&#039;t do a great job at leveraging them. For example, on their Wal-Mart facebook group (that no longer exists) instead of being a space where people talked about how they love Wal-Mart (which there obviously are, as you point out - people are opening their wallets) where were they [those fans] when people were posting anti-Wal-Mart pictures on their page and writing anti-Walmart content on their wall.
Microsoft, on the other hand has focused on a positive aspect of their business that people get excited about and are willing to express that excitement on an online, public forum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken, that&#8217;s a fair point. But on the flip side, if someone was to write &#8220;Wal-Mart, in general, is a very well-liked brand&#8221; could equally be viewed as &#8220;absurd&#8221;.<br />
I guess, what I should have written in my post to make it clear is that Wal-Mart, obviously does have fans; but in an online environment &#8211; doesn&#8217;t do a great job at leveraging them. For example, on their Wal-Mart facebook group (that no longer exists) instead of being a space where people talked about how they love Wal-Mart (which there obviously are, as you point out &#8211; people are opening their wallets) where were they [those fans] when people were posting anti-Wal-Mart pictures on their page and writing anti-Walmart content on their wall.<br />
Microsoft, on the other hand has focused on a positive aspect of their business that people get excited about and are willing to express that excitement on an online, public forum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Leebow</title>
		<link>http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2008/05/08/an-unlikely-social-networking-success-story/comment-page-1/#comment-120225</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Leebow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 10:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2008/05/08/an-unlikely-social-networking-success-story/#comment-120225</guid>
		<description>Your comment: &quot;Wal-Mart, in general, is not a very well liked brand,&quot; is absurd. 

You must be paying too much attention to the media. Every day, people vote with their pocketbook and it&#039;s obvious that Wal-Mart is winning by a landslide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your comment: &#8220;Wal-Mart, in general, is not a very well liked brand,&#8221; is absurd. </p>
<p>You must be paying too much attention to the media. Every day, people vote with their pocketbook and it&#8217;s obvious that Wal-Mart is winning by a landslide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Herman</title>
		<link>http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2008/05/08/an-unlikely-social-networking-success-story/comment-page-1/#comment-120029</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Herman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 20:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2008/05/08/an-unlikely-social-networking-success-story/#comment-120029</guid>
		<description>Hey Ming, I think there&#039;s one key difference between these two examples - Microsoft, while indeed a behemoth, has had a thriving collaboration model / developer network operating since the 1980&#039;s (online since 1993) that has endowed it with a following in the millions. Sure, it&#039;s not the coolest company in consumer terms but for programmers they&#039;ve built a following that can easily be mirrored on a Facebook page - i.e. the success might not be that surprising.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Ming, I think there&#8217;s one key difference between these two examples &#8211; Microsoft, while indeed a behemoth, has had a thriving collaboration model / developer network operating since the 1980&#8242;s (online since 1993) that has endowed it with a following in the millions. Sure, it&#8217;s not the coolest company in consumer terms but for programmers they&#8217;ve built a following that can easily be mirrored on a Facebook page &#8211; i.e. the success might not be that surprising.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

