book personals

men sex personals

scandinavia singles

1991 singles

rich woman dating

scandinaviasingles

girls looking for sex

for singles only

dating online website

adult city

dating united kingdom

mocha singles

bradford dating

escort date

chicago matchmaker

dating investment banker

meet latinas

ads personal

canada dating

sexcontact

personal dating sites

lesbian girl

90 minutes escort service

dating line

find sex tonight

singles events los angeles

100 free dating site in europe

dating rich man

sex camara

x50 escort

mature women dating

hot match up

singles chat sites

on line sex chat

man to man dating

pareja swinger

nepali dating sites

miami singles events

signature singles

photo personals co uk

www ladies

swinger clubs in dc

dating site in russia

affairs ie

aff.com

singles hotels

adulrfriendfinder com

download japanese sex

discrete affair

dating girls

dating internet safety

internet dating online

online dating spain

indian singles meet

date web page

local single men

talk match com

sex web cam girls

leather sex gay

singles scene nyc

swinging parties uk

dating united states

mobile phone sex lines

couple looking for sex

japanese dating site

cheap sex chat lines

vancouver washington singles

sex arabic

pine bluff singles

fat personals

asian dating

looking for sex in uk

ukraine mail order brides

cruises singles

oc weekly personals

black booty women

men on dating

adultchannel

swinger dogging

chat to make friends

best on line dating

girls web cam chat

asian girl picture

cam2cam girl

singles va

a friend finder

kansas friend finder

out personals com

singles in north carolina

yahoo personal uk

hippy singles

ebonyfriendfinder

social singles

dating swinger

singles vacation mexico

premium personals

singles internet dating

hardcore

speed dating san diego

married women seeking discreet

Business - Written by on Thursday, May 8, 2008 14:21 - 5 Comments

An unlikely social (networking) success story

A while ago I wrote a blog post on Wal-Mart and its failed social networking endeavours. Many comments I’ve received regarding that post pointed out that Wal-Mart, in general, is not a very well liked brand. Therefore, regardless of what they do, they would never succeed in that type of open environment.

Although I understand that point and agree with it to a certain extent, I do not believe that it’s impossible for companies who don’t have the best reputation offline to do well in an online environment such as social networking. Through my research I’ve come across a surprising example of one company that has done incredibly well online; a company whose success is quite unexpected.

The company I’m referring to is Microsoft. I would argue that, comparable to Wal-Mart, there are many different interest groups that like to rally against it, but for some reason, Microsoft has managed to develop strong and healthy communities.
The difference: Microsoft has focused on its strengths and has managed to deliver tangible results. The best example, Microsoft’s “i’m making a difference” campaign on Facebook has 67,800 members in its group and has raised $1,409,788 for different charities since March 2007.

I’m is an initiative that donates to a social cause every time a user sends an instant message (IM). Windows Messenger has partnered with ten charitable organizations: The American Red Cross, Boys & Girls clubs of America, National AIDS Fund, The Humane Society of the United states, ninmillion.org, National Multiple Sclerosis Society, Sierra Club, UNICEF, StopGlobalWarming.org and Susan G. Komen for the cure. “Every time you start a conversation using i’m, Microsoft shares a portion of the program’s advertising revenue with some of the world’s most effective organizations dedicated to social causes.”
i’m making a difference

Windows has taken a non-aggressive approach to advertise its brand, leading people to associate it with a charitable cause and framing Microsoft’s MSN messenger service in a positive light. This initiative is mutually beneficial since it allows Microsoft to build goodwill among consumers while at the same time gain more MSN Messenger users since it has always lagged behind AOL’s AIM service in the United States. With social networks, companies have an opportunity to develop applications or groups that may not be directly related to selling products but can create goodwill and brand equity in other ways.

Not directly related to social networking, but another creative way Microsoft has gotten people to use its IM service (this time catered to Canadians) by holding a contest giving Canadian msn users a daily chance to win $1,000. Users simply have to log in and register once, and they are automatically entered into the daily draw. Users may then increase their chance of winning the money by sharing news of the contest to friends on facebook or on their Windows Live “Space”.



5 Comments

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

Dan Herman
May 8, 2008 16:19

Hey Ming, I think there’s one key difference between these two examples – Microsoft, while indeed a behemoth, has had a thriving collaboration model / developer network operating since the 1980′s (online since 1993) that has endowed it with a following in the millions. Sure, it’s not the coolest company in consumer terms but for programmers they’ve built a following that can easily be mirrored on a Facebook page – i.e. the success might not be that surprising.

Ken Leebow
May 9, 2008 6:50

Your comment: “Wal-Mart, in general, is not a very well liked brand,” is absurd.

You must be paying too much attention to the media. Every day, people vote with their pocketbook and it’s obvious that Wal-Mart is winning by a landslide.

Ming Kwan
May 9, 2008 16:23

Ken, that’s a fair point. But on the flip side, if someone was to write “Wal-Mart, in general, is a very well-liked brand” could equally be viewed as “absurd”.
I guess, what I should have written in my post to make it clear is that Wal-Mart, obviously does have fans; but in an online environment – doesn’t do a great job at leveraging them. For example, on their Wal-Mart facebook group (that no longer exists) instead of being a space where people talked about how they love Wal-Mart (which there obviously are, as you point out – people are opening their wallets) where were they [those fans] when people were posting anti-Wal-Mart pictures on their page and writing anti-Walmart content on their wall.
Microsoft, on the other hand has focused on a positive aspect of their business that people get excited about and are willing to express that excitement on an online, public forum.

Alan Majer
May 9, 2008 16:54

It’s by no means scientific, but here’s the number of results produced for google searches of several phrases related to Wal-Mart:
9,120 “I love Wal-Mart”
18,000 “I hate Wal-Mart”
11,300 “I love WalMart”
19,600 “I hate WalMart”

To be fair, there’s also quite a few fans that “like” Wal-Mart too:
3,780 “I like Wal-Mart”
28,800 “I like WalMart”

DH
May 9, 2008 18:15

For a more scientific approach to these metrics, I used Googlefight to analyze whether more people love or hate Walmart.

The results:

“I love Walmart” = 851,000
“I hate Walmart” = 585,000

Coming soon in paperback! Help rename the paperback version of Macrowikinomics and win a one-hour webinar for you and your colleagues with Don Tapscott. Ends 5:00pm ET, August 31. Learn more.

Business - Oct 5, 2010 12:00 - 0 Comments

DRM and us

More In Business


Entertainment - Aug 3, 2010 13:14 - 2 Comments

Want to see the future? Look to the games

More In Entertainment


Society - Aug 6, 2010 8:19 - 4 Comments

The Empire strikes a light

More In Society