Business - Written by Ming Kwan on Thursday, April 3, 2008 16:12 - 5 Comments

Do you know where your children are? (Online)

According to a survey of 5,000 adults and 3,000 children in the UK released by OfCom (Office of Communications) yesterday, 49% of children between the ages of 8 – 17 are on some form of social networking site.

It’s amazing the difference a few years makes in the daily lives of young people. When I was young (and I’d like to think I’m still relatively young), at elementary school, the only way to keep in touch with classmates was through snail mail (at that age I wasn’t allowed to, nor was I interested in, using the phone) – and snail mail definitely isn’t the best way to communicate with anyone. But even as I got older, I never got to use technologies such as IM to keep in touch with my friends at school during the summer time or to discuss questions about homework. (I remember when I first started using IM at the end of high school, probably around OAC, my friends thought I was really geeky and nerdy – my IM use really took off when I got to university though). I look at how my sisters study and do work now in high school and it seems like light-years have passed from the archaic idea of dictionaries, encyclopedias and even libraries – who uses books these days anyways? When you have Wikipedia! Why do you need to consult any of those ‘old-school’ resources when everything can be found online?

Now, social networks add an entirely new dimension of communication and keeping in touch; but along with these opportunities, there are risks. Although most social networking sites have a minimum age policy of 13 or 14, none of these are actively enforced and when young kids, say 13 or 14 (let’s not even talk about any younger than that) come online, realistically speaking, they’re probably not aware of the implications associated with having a profile online with pictures and personal information. What’s more, many of them may not entirely understand the idea of privacy and controlling those privacy settings. Even greater cause for concern however, as discovered from this survey, 16% of parents polled don’t know if their child’s profile is visible to all and 53% of children say their parents don’t set rules for them when using social networking sites. These numbers may be a bit scary, but if you think about it, there are also huge implications for this generation – the “Net Generation” – in the workforce. If people think that the kids graduating today are ‘bad’ and grew up differently, then what about the kids that will be graduating 10-15 years from now?

Here’re some interesting stats pulled out from the OfCom research (pulled from an article on the BBC):

• 49% of children 8-17 have an online profile
• 22% of 16+ have an online profile
• 59% of 8 to 17-year-olds use social networks to make new friends
• 16% of parents do not know if their child’s profile is visible to all
• 33% of parents say they set no rules for their children’s use of social networks
• 43% of children say their parents set no rules for use of social networks

Ofcom



5 Comments

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Dan Thornton
Apr 4, 2008 4:53

Why does it always come down to the internet replacing books, rather than the two co-existing?

How else can you explain the copy of Wikinomics on my bookshelf, alongside The Long Tail, Join The Coversation, Unleash the Ideavirus etc?

The main problems that are being highlighted regarding children online and using videogames are mainly because parents, educational institutions and other organisations are too scared to actually participate and understand the online world to find the best solutions.

And maybe some of that is down to us proclaiming the end of print, books, TV etc

Ming Kwan
Apr 4, 2008 8:06

Hi Dan, thanks for the comment.
To clarify, I wasn’t proclaiming the end of books. I know many of my friends, myself included like to read and try to find time to read. What I was referring to more specifically, was when it comes to elementary school/highschool/university students doing research for projects, papers etc. When I was younger I remember doing a lot of research using books and encyclopedias but now all the young peopel I know (and I have to admit even when I was in university) I have a hard time thinking of people who actually used books to help with their research. The closest they come to reading books is online journal articles. (And that may also be a function of parents not encouraging their children to read from a young age) That’s not to say that books are dead, obviously people will continue reading recreationally and out of interest. But specifically when it comes to an academic setting. For example, a young child working on a project on trees. I think they would sooner do that research on the internet and find pictures of different trees on the internet than go to their school library to find that book (unless encouraged by parents).

Jenn Durley
Apr 4, 2008 12:02

As the parent of an almost-10 year old who is itching to join the world of online social networking, I am definitely concerned about the risks, and agree with Ming’s comments that most kids don’t fully understand the implications of sharing photos / personal information online. Kids need parental guidance to be safe online just the same as with any other aspect of life.

Pre-teens and teens need space to try out social behaviours and personas: to define themselves against others. In my youth, electronic communication was limited to one phone in the middle of the house (not very private!). However, I had much more physical freedom to roam around town and hang out with my friends in person.

Sure, new technology presents new risks, but there are also new rewards. Today’s kids will know how to communicate (and collaborate!) in all sorts of ways. I am personally very excited about what the future might hold for my child. I just hope I can keep up!

Dan Herman
Apr 7, 2008 9:42

Andrew Keen recently touched on the subject of children, security and the web here:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/comment/andrew-keen-on-new-media-805349.html

Brittany Creamer
May 14, 2008 23:16

I agree with Ming that Web 2.0 technologies are revolutionizing how young people communicate. I graduated high school just three years ago and even as recently as 2005, we were not allowed to use internet sources, even academic databases, as sources for our papers and projects. As an undergraduate student at UT last semester, I was compiling my groups’ individual works cited and found that one group member cited an unsubstantiated Wikipedia article as a source for our academic project. She was offended when I asked her to find a more reliable source.

I wholeheartedly believe Wikipedia is an incredible tool and a great place to begin research, but it can hardly be the final word. Young researchers must learn how to use these resources wisely. As young students’ reliance on internet resources for academic purposes grows, so too must schools’ understanding of the technologies’ implications and appropriate uses. Schools must adapt and teach students basic things like what constitutes a good source. Blocking wiki platforms and social networks on district computers is not the solution. Students must be taught that the internet’s greatest strength, its freedom and availability of information, is also its greatest weakness. Children’s use of web 2.0 technology is not just a parent’s responsibility.

Leave a Reply

Comment

Browse Content

Business - Mar 19, 2010 16:57 - 0 Comments

Addressing the social media ‘support gap’

More In Business


Entertainment - Mar 9, 2010 16:58 - 3 Comments

Lessons in collaboration from B.B. King’s

More In Entertainment


Society - Mar 17, 2010 9:45 - 0 Comments

On unintended consequences

More In Society