<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Defining engagement for Gov 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2008/02/11/defining-engagement-for-gov-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2008/02/11/defining-engagement-for-gov-20/</link>
	<description>Exploring How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2011 14:21:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Naumi Haque</title>
		<link>http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2008/02/11/defining-engagement-for-gov-20/comment-page-1/#comment-96162</link>
		<dc:creator>Naumi Haque</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2008/02/11/defining-engagement-for-gov-20/#comment-96162</guid>
		<description>I like what you&#039;re saying here Dan. &quot;Engagement&quot; as a term is totally flaky. You can&#039;t measure or quantify engagement. Investment on the other hand requires a measurable input. More importantly, as you state, it suggests the idea of a Return on Investment which means there is a definable outcome. 

Of course, that&#039;s the economist thinking. A marketer would tell you that there is an entire unmeasurable &quot;promotional economy&quot; or &quot;influence economy&quot; that equals up to 10% of the GDP (I know, its funny to throw out a $1.4 trillion number for something unmeasurable). Think about all the factors that influence decsion making but that aren&#039;t measured using traditional metrics. For a marketer, &quot;engagement&quot; reflects that unmeasurable involvement in a brand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like what you&#8217;re saying here Dan. &#8220;Engagement&#8221; as a term is totally flaky. You can&#8217;t measure or quantify engagement. Investment on the other hand requires a measurable input. More importantly, as you state, it suggests the idea of a Return on Investment which means there is a definable outcome. </p>
<p>Of course, that&#8217;s the economist thinking. A marketer would tell you that there is an entire unmeasurable &#8220;promotional economy&#8221; or &#8220;influence economy&#8221; that equals up to 10% of the GDP (I know, its funny to throw out a $1.4 trillion number for something unmeasurable). Think about all the factors that influence decsion making but that aren&#8217;t measured using traditional metrics. For a marketer, &#8220;engagement&#8221; reflects that unmeasurable involvement in a brand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Zinger</title>
		<link>http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2008/02/11/defining-engagement-for-gov-20/comment-page-1/#comment-94764</link>
		<dc:creator>David Zinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 23:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2008/02/11/defining-engagement-for-gov-20/#comment-94764</guid>
		<description>I think I liked this article but it had so much jargon it was hard to tell at times. I love engagement, I liked the idea of investment but I got lost on target populations, inputs, and a few other terms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I liked this article but it had so much jargon it was hard to tell at times. I love engagement, I liked the idea of investment but I got lost on target populations, inputs, and a few other terms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

