Hey wiki comics is advertising some pharmacy links you can find below. Sorry for any inconvenience. Hope you can understand... Links are below: Tadalafil Citrate | generic cialis 10 mg | tadalafil citrate 10mg | tadalafil citrate 5mg | generic cialis 40 mg |

Business - Written by on Wednesday, January 16, 2008 13:33 - 1 Comment

A dissertation on mass collaboration

It’s the first I’ve heard of a dissertation being written on mass collaboration, although I suspect there are many more out there. I have yet to read it in full, although I did note that our friend Howard Rheingold is one of the examiners. The author, Mark Elliot, points out that while Don and I were the first to write about mass collaboration, our book wouldn’t make it through a PhD examination process due to it’s lack of analytical rigor (see below)! Fair enough, but that’s why we love it when others, especially academics, build on our work.

Wikinomics: How mass collaboration changes everything (Tapscott & Williams 2006) is the first published work to directly address mass collaboration, an often cited example of Web 2.0 and the guiding topic of this thesis. While generally geared towards providing ‘examples of how people and organizations are harnessing these principles to drive innovation in their workplaces, communities, and industries’ (2006:20), Tapscott and Williams aim to identify new trends and methods of peer production labelling the majority of them as mass collaborative. Tapscott and Williams claim that mass collaboration is associated with ‘deep changes in the structure and modus operandi of the corporation and our economy, based on new competitive principles such as openness, peering, sharing, and acting globally’ (2006:4). They also suggest that the ‘new promise of collaboration is that with peer production we will harness human skill, ingenuity, and intelligence more efficiently and effectively than anything we have witnessed previously’ (2006:18).

However, Tapscott and Williams fail to provide an adequate definition or criteria for discerning collaboration from other collective activities such as cooperation and coordination. This has the effect of lowering the term to that of a buzzword and stripping it of analytical value. In fact, in most cases where authors use the term ‘collaboration’, it could be exchanged with ‘cooperation’ to little semantic, effect leaving the discerning reader to wonder why collaboration was used at all. This is not to suggest that there is no difference between the terms, on the contrary, it is precisely the distinctions which forms a key conceptual foundation for this thesis. Rather, in the distinguishing of collaboration from cooperation and coordination, it becomes possible to discern important differences in a range of the collective activities discussed by Tapscott and Williams and others.

Overall, Tapscott and Williams’ analysis is typical of inquiries into novel Internet developments in that it deals with the activity in a manner and tone geared towards commercial application. While this is a valid aspect to investigate and one which certainly enhances our understanding of the phenomenon, it generally does not engage the subject deeply enough to provide rigorous conceptual frameworks into the underlying nature, architecture and dynamics of the activity. However, their work does provide valuable examples and anecdotal insights useful in the support and theorising of such frameworks.

Thanks Mark for letting me know about this and congratulations on your graduation! Here’s a general call to other PhD students working on similar themes to let me know about your research.

1 Comment

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

Jan 17, 2008 11:36

PhD Dissertation: How much help is too much..

There is a significant amount of discussion on this subject followed sometimes by heated arguments.

Surely no one will deny that having your dissertation written for you is very wrong and will bring down upon you, without hesitation, the wrath of your advisor.

On the other hand, it is not unusual for Doctorate students to get help on specific chapters of their dissertation. It also is not unusual for advisors to encourage students to seek outside help.

Many students hit their dissertation “brick wall” when they encounter the statistics section. Frequently, a student will struggle for months with that section before they seek a consultant to help them.

If I were to name a single reason why a PhD candidate gets off track in their program it is the statistics and their fear of statistics.

So, the question is whether or not it is ethical to get help at all. If so, how much help is too much.

I don’t know if there has ever been a survey of advisors who were asked this question, however, I know many advisors take the following position when they suggest or approve outside help:

“To a large extent the process is self controlling. If the student relies too much on a consultant, the product may look good, however, the student will be unable to defend his/her dissertation”.

It takes a committed effort on the part of the student and the consultant (resulting in a collaborative/teaching exchange) to have the student responsible for the data and thoroughly understand the statistics. The day the student walks in front of the committee to defend, there should be no question as to his/her ability to defend.

When that defense is successful the question of “was the help too much” is answered.

Now available in paperback!
Don Tapscott and Anthony D. William's latest collaboration, Macrowikinomics: New Solutions for a Connected Planet. Learn more.

Business - Oct 5, 2010 12:00 - 0 Comments

DRM and us

More In Business

Entertainment - Aug 3, 2010 13:14 - 2 Comments

Want to see the future? Look to the games

More In Entertainment

Society - Aug 6, 2010 8:19 - 4 Comments

The Empire strikes a light

More In Society