Business - Written by David Cameron on Thursday, October 4, 2007 14:16 - 3 Comments
Microsoft and HealthVault.com
From an article on the New York Times
An announcement was made today on the launch of the Microsoft HealthVault. The website’s services include: a free personal health record, and a search engine designed for health queries.
The website is a portal to your personal information, locked securely in the Microsoft “Vault” equiped with encryption and high security. The information placed in there would be done primarily by doctors, and health care partners that you have given specific permission to have access.

From the article:
The organizations that have signed up for HealthVault projects with Microsoft include the American Heart Association, Johnson & Johnson LifeScan, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, the Mayo Clinic and MedStar Health, a network of seven hospitals in the Baltimore-Washington region.
I think the idea of having a centralized health care database where professionals who are put in charge of your health can see and read everything about your medication, illnesses, allergies and more is a great idea. My biggest concern is the privacy issues with having all that information in one spot, we already have companies like Google tracking everything we do in Gmail, in searches and more. I’d hate to see how personalized my web surfing would become in the future if companies like Microsoft started displaying ads for Heart medication after probing my database.
The privacy issues aside, I think it’s long overdue to have a centralized health care database, and as long as they can keep privacy their biggest concern I think it’s a step in the right direction. I wonder how many years it will be before this type of service becomes more mainstream, as I suspect this will be slow to take off.
3 Comments
james cannon
I applaud MS on this project. This move is cutting edge. If handled correctly, it could be a win for all stakeholders across heathcare in the US. One thing MS should keep in mind is that while it seems their project’s initial and primary focus is consumer/patient driven, the healthcare payment industry focus (i.e. business to business commerce between provider and payer to pay claims) is huge and could gain traction much quicker than relying on patients to participate as a matter of first impression. MS should remember that protected health information (PHI), by federal regulation, is allowed to be widley and freely shared for purposes of “effecting payment or reimbursement” to from healthcare payers to healthcare providers. Providers and payers should welcome a secure and uniform platform through which they can easily share medical record and claim information to adjudicate the patient’s bill for services rendered. The information and documentation generated by commerce between payer and provider could very quickly populate the “vault” regardless of whether the patient chooses to access or share the medical record or claim information. Patients readily agree each day via admission and/or discharge documentation to share their PHI with any payer source for the purpose to effect payment of their claim per HIPAA regulations. MS needs to understand that every health care event generates an account receivable and attendant medical record information that payers require to review before payment to a provider or patient. MS can populate their vault and work with providers and payers to advertise to patients that the vault is already full of information that the patient can see (and share) if the so choose. Bottom line, providers and payers can easily populate the vault by placing this information therein which they are already sharing with the patients consent on a daily basis by transactions numbered in the millions each day…..
“I’d hate to see how personalized my web surfing would become in the future if companies like Microsoft started displaying ads for Heart medication after probing my database.”
This will never happen, HIPAA is cracking the whip hard on this one. First of all, what you’re worried about is illegal, and second of all it would require an entire team focused on the development of such a project, and quite frankly, Microsoft would never put themselves in this type of a risk.
Business - Oct 5, 2010 12:00 - 0 Comments
DRM and us
More In Business
- Facebook, Facebook, Facebook
- Survey: How are you using Facebook, Twitter, smart phones, and other technology platforms?
- Will Facebook be your CRM provider?
- Wiki Banking
- The importance of being competent
Entertainment - Aug 3, 2010 13:14 - 2 Comments
Want to see the future? Look to the games
More In Entertainment
- Lessons in collaboration from B.B. King’s
- CL!CK – LEGO’s fun social product development platform
- Peer Pressure 2.0: Farmville
- Online gaming more than just fun
- The NFL – The most protective league, attempting to control the uncontrollable
Society - Aug 6, 2010 8:19 - 4 Comments
The Empire strikes a light
More In Society
- Balance: customer receptivity vs. customer revulsion
- The Net Gen: Too plugged-in for parenting?
- Are you addicted to social media?
- The privacy discussion we need to have
- “The Data-Driven Life”: Who’s not interested in discovery?

Coming soon in paperback! Help rename the paperback version of Macrowikinomics and win a one-hour webinar for you and your colleagues with Don Tapscott. Ends 5:00pm ET, August 31.
I believe Google will come up with advertising that is totally demand driven, that is to say consumer pull rather than push.
They are already well placed to take advantage of web tv, and have policies in place to limit the amount of visible targeted advertising appropriate to the web pages being displayed.
As Google seems to be a strongly collaborative company, we must hope and encourage them to stick to their principals in this respect.