<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Radiohead lets you name the price when downloading songs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2007/10/01/radiohead-lets-you-name-the-price-when-downloading-songs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2007/10/01/radiohead-lets-you-name-the-price-when-downloading-songs/</link>
	<description>Exploring How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2011 14:21:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scaduatty</title>
		<link>http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2007/10/01/radiohead-lets-you-name-the-price-when-downloading-songs/comment-page-1/#comment-155357</link>
		<dc:creator>Scaduatty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 11:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2007/10/01/radiohead-lets-you-name-the-price-when-downloading-songs/#comment-155357</guid>
		<description>Пoлезные статьи о Seo, продвижении сайтов и заработку в интернет</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Пoлезные статьи о Seo, продвижении сайтов и заработку в интернет</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wikinomics &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Radiohead again leaves us thinking: Did they just do that?</title>
		<link>http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2007/10/01/radiohead-lets-you-name-the-price-when-downloading-songs/comment-page-1/#comment-149997</link>
		<dc:creator>Wikinomics &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Radiohead again leaves us thinking: Did they just do that?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 11:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2007/10/01/radiohead-lets-you-name-the-price-when-downloading-songs/#comment-149997</guid>
		<description>[...] 15th, 2008, 07:41am  A darling of the Wikinomics blog (1,2,3), Radiohead has impressed before, and with their latest video for House of Cards, they do so [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 15th, 2008, 07:41am  A darling of the Wikinomics blog (1,2,3), Radiohead has impressed before, and with their latest video for House of Cards, they do so [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How to find profits in a struggling industry</title>
		<link>http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2007/10/01/radiohead-lets-you-name-the-price-when-downloading-songs/comment-page-1/#comment-103581</link>
		<dc:creator>How to find profits in a struggling industry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2007/10/01/radiohead-lets-you-name-the-price-when-downloading-songs/#comment-103581</guid>
		<description>[...] will have to say this, proposing a piracy surcharge on ISPs is insanity. Artists should follow the Radiohead model and make the money on their concerts and maybe someone will come out with the right technology to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] will have to say this, proposing a piracy surcharge on ISPs is insanity. Artists should follow the Radiohead model and make the money on their concerts and maybe someone will come out with the right technology to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wikinomics &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Music 1.0 is Dead and Other Things We Already Knew</title>
		<link>http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2007/10/01/radiohead-lets-you-name-the-price-when-downloading-songs/comment-page-1/#comment-100459</link>
		<dc:creator>Wikinomics &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Music 1.0 is Dead and Other Things We Already Knew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 20:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2007/10/01/radiohead-lets-you-name-the-price-when-downloading-songs/#comment-100459</guid>
		<description>[...] success of Radiohead&#8217;s pay-what-you-want album is just one example of the music industry trying to drag itself into the 21st century. The digital [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] success of Radiohead&#8217;s pay-what-you-want album is just one example of the music industry trying to drag itself into the 21st century. The digital [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wikinomics &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Free is still the best price according to Radiohead fans</title>
		<link>http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2007/10/01/radiohead-lets-you-name-the-price-when-downloading-songs/comment-page-1/#comment-65702</link>
		<dc:creator>Wikinomics &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Free is still the best price according to Radiohead fans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 20:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2007/10/01/radiohead-lets-you-name-the-price-when-downloading-songs/#comment-65702</guid>
		<description>[...] the best price according to Radiohead fans Just another quick update to our previous post about Radiohead’s recent decision to let users set the price of their latest album In Rainbows. Commenting on the first update, “An [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the best price according to Radiohead fans Just another quick update to our previous post about Radiohead’s recent decision to let users set the price of their latest album In Rainbows. Commenting on the first update, “An [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wikinomics &#187; Blog Archive &#187; An update on Radiohead downloads</title>
		<link>http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2007/10/01/radiohead-lets-you-name-the-price-when-downloading-songs/comment-page-1/#comment-41020</link>
		<dc:creator>Wikinomics &#187; Blog Archive &#187; An update on Radiohead downloads</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 20:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2007/10/01/radiohead-lets-you-name-the-price-when-downloading-songs/#comment-41020</guid>
		<description>[...] update on Radiohead downloads On October 1st, we first blogged on how Radiohead lets your name the price when downloading songs. Well, we have a bit of an update with how successful that has been (aside [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] update on Radiohead downloads On October 1st, we first blogged on how Radiohead lets your name the price when downloading songs. Well, we have a bit of an update with how successful that has been (aside [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Porter</title>
		<link>http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2007/10/01/radiohead-lets-you-name-the-price-when-downloading-songs/comment-page-1/#comment-38960</link>
		<dc:creator>Porter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 22:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2007/10/01/radiohead-lets-you-name-the-price-when-downloading-songs/#comment-38960</guid>
		<description>Like the music industry, I would definitely be skeptical of a state-imposed license fee.  What would be the state&#039;s incentive here?

Also, wouldn&#039;t it have similar infrastructure challenges as a pay-as-you-go system?  (Or, is the global license fee a &quot;one price fits all&quot; mechanism, at which point it&#039;s socialized entertainment spending?)

I would think that &quot;simple&quot; upgrades to current music playing software would effectively do the trick.  Integration with a service like Gracenote could also help identify and tie music of varying formats and sources back to the appropriate content provider.

Of course, I would want to see that artists are getting a fair share, too - since we&#039;re dreaming here.  (This would encourage consumer adoption, actually.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like the music industry, I would definitely be skeptical of a state-imposed license fee.  What would be the state&#8217;s incentive here?</p>
<p>Also, wouldn&#8217;t it have similar infrastructure challenges as a pay-as-you-go system?  (Or, is the global license fee a &#8220;one price fits all&#8221; mechanism, at which point it&#8217;s socialized entertainment spending?)</p>
<p>I would think that &#8220;simple&#8221; upgrades to current music playing software would effectively do the trick.  Integration with a service like Gracenote could also help identify and tie music of varying formats and sources back to the appropriate content provider.</p>
<p>Of course, I would want to see that artists are getting a fair share, too &#8211; since we&#8217;re dreaming here.  (This would encourage consumer adoption, actually.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Cameron</title>
		<link>http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2007/10/01/radiohead-lets-you-name-the-price-when-downloading-songs/comment-page-1/#comment-38915</link>
		<dc:creator>David Cameron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 13:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2007/10/01/radiohead-lets-you-name-the-price-when-downloading-songs/#comment-38915</guid>
		<description>Porter –

Although the idea of a pay-as-you go system sounds appealing; it would most likely be fairly difficult to implement. You would need the support of a platform like iTunes to be able to track and deduct from an account (so as to reduce transaction costs). I agree though that a system that fairly compensates artists for songs you “like” and is legal makes logical sense. The question is which models can be easily rolled out, and make economic sense?

What about a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/01/24/business/ptend25.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;global license fee&lt;/a&gt;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Porter –</p>
<p>Although the idea of a pay-as-you go system sounds appealing; it would most likely be fairly difficult to implement. You would need the support of a platform like iTunes to be able to track and deduct from an account (so as to reduce transaction costs). I agree though that a system that fairly compensates artists for songs you “like” and is legal makes logical sense. The question is which models can be easily rolled out, and make economic sense?</p>
<p>What about a <a href="http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/01/24/business/ptend25.php" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">global license fee</a>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Porter</title>
		<link>http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2007/10/01/radiohead-lets-you-name-the-price-when-downloading-songs/comment-page-1/#comment-38869</link>
		<dc:creator>Porter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 06:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2007/10/01/radiohead-lets-you-name-the-price-when-downloading-songs/#comment-38869</guid>
		<description>Have the labels (or anyone else) ever considered a pay-as-you go system?  I would be very interested to see a file format that lets you listen once free, then charge a nickel per-listen up to some price cap ($.99?).  

It&#039;d be successfully monetized by standardizing a method for tracking listens, not restricting where it can play.

This way I can try music out, and if I like it (who doesn&#039;t come back to music they like with some frequency?), people make money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have the labels (or anyone else) ever considered a pay-as-you go system?  I would be very interested to see a file format that lets you listen once free, then charge a nickel per-listen up to some price cap ($.99?).  </p>
<p>It&#8217;d be successfully monetized by standardizing a method for tracking listens, not restricting where it can play.</p>
<p>This way I can try music out, and if I like it (who doesn&#8217;t come back to music they like with some frequency?), people make money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Preston</title>
		<link>http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2007/10/01/radiohead-lets-you-name-the-price-when-downloading-songs/comment-page-1/#comment-38783</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Preston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 15:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2007/10/01/radiohead-lets-you-name-the-price-when-downloading-songs/#comment-38783</guid>
		<description>This move will play on the psyche of an entire generation of people that have used the web as their main channel of discovering new music. I just hope that when this is all said and done, Radiohead will release the figures of what the average person actually paid. These numbers will make every label in the world shit themselves. Well, maybe.

Also, this move will raise questions about the seeming slap in the face to record stores. At first, I really thought that indie stores will be super pissed and burn Radiohead records in the streets. Well, not so fast. If you stop and think about it, this entire packaging scheme actually drives the value through the roof because Radiohead fans will absolutely go to stores to purchase this uber-cd release. I hope indie record stores take a deep breath before they start smashing Radiohead records in the aisles. With an actual product of value and uniqueness, Radiohead may actually have an incredibly positive impact on driving traffic to record stores. Everything just changed. In the not so distant future, just putting an album out on CD in a jewel case will no longer be enough. Could the box set be the future of physical products? 

The last bit is the utter disregard of lead time in press. They are totally avoiding leaks by putting this out all at once. When I first started thinking about this, my immediate concern was that, with no press time, who the hell is going to write about it and review it? It was at this point that I logged into my RSS feed reader to see if anyone was writing about it. Every music blog in the world had a bit about it. It is a music press coup unlike anything the world has ever seen. Most notable and interesting of all, Billboard didn&#039;t have a post up about it when I first logged in. Only music blogs. Fans of music. Mainstream press, the folks the industry as a whole is aiming to please is now on the backside playing catch-up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This move will play on the psyche of an entire generation of people that have used the web as their main channel of discovering new music. I just hope that when this is all said and done, Radiohead will release the figures of what the average person actually paid. These numbers will make every label in the world shit themselves. Well, maybe.</p>
<p>Also, this move will raise questions about the seeming slap in the face to record stores. At first, I really thought that indie stores will be super pissed and burn Radiohead records in the streets. Well, not so fast. If you stop and think about it, this entire packaging scheme actually drives the value through the roof because Radiohead fans will absolutely go to stores to purchase this uber-cd release. I hope indie record stores take a deep breath before they start smashing Radiohead records in the aisles. With an actual product of value and uniqueness, Radiohead may actually have an incredibly positive impact on driving traffic to record stores. Everything just changed. In the not so distant future, just putting an album out on CD in a jewel case will no longer be enough. Could the box set be the future of physical products? </p>
<p>The last bit is the utter disregard of lead time in press. They are totally avoiding leaks by putting this out all at once. When I first started thinking about this, my immediate concern was that, with no press time, who the hell is going to write about it and review it? It was at this point that I logged into my RSS feed reader to see if anyone was writing about it. Every music blog in the world had a bit about it. It is a music press coup unlike anything the world has ever seen. Most notable and interesting of all, Billboard didn&#8217;t have a post up about it when I first logged in. Only music blogs. Fans of music. Mainstream press, the folks the industry as a whole is aiming to please is now on the backside playing catch-up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

