Business - Written by Derek Pokora on Friday, August 24, 2007 17:55 - 1 Comment
The Influence of Web 2.0 on American Politics
John Edwards uses Twitter. Obama’s the most widely viewed candidate on YouTube. Both the Yearly KOS, and the CNN/You Tube debates have happened, and now MySpace and MTV have announced a series of one-on-one candidate forums. The internet, and especially Web 2.0, has given candidates an extremely cost-effective way to reach millions of potential voters.
In an article by Josh Catone, he questions whether predicting the next US election based on Internet popularity might be a big mistake. Refer to the chart below.
According the data compiled here, it appears that the battle is between Barack Obama and Ron Paul for the Presidency. However, according to practically every poll conducted this past month, Hillary Clinton and Rudy Giuliani have commanding leads. Catone’s reasoning for the disconnect? Age (younger people are more active online, but participate less in active voting), the ‘coolness’ factor (people socially connecting to politicians online but failing to follow through), and the possibility of errors in polling.
However, these descrepancies do not mean that the active engagement in politics online is without repercussion. In fact, inexpensive marketing as a result of the second wave of the web can actually aid a politician in fundraising, as well as building awareness. On the other hand, fundraising may not be as large of an issue as it has been in the past, given that the playing field is levelling out. How much did it cost Barack Obama to communicate to eleven million viewers? Nothing.
I think that Catone brings up some valuable insights. If age is a factor, then I would like to take this opportunity to encourage the youth of America to vote. If you claim to support someone online, then vote for them! The time invested to write a few messages on a candidates profile would be far better spent by going down to a booth and actually voting for the candidate you claim to support. Be consistent. If you are going to harness the democratic power of Web 2.0, then apply that belief to your own political system. It was implemented there first, was it not?
1 Comment
» The influence of Web 2.0 on American politics Public Sector Marketing 2.0
Coming soon in paperback! Help rename the paperback version of Macrowikinomics and win a one-hour webinar for you and your colleagues with Don Tapscott. Ends 5:00pm ET, August 31. Learn more.
Business - Oct 5, 2010 12:00 - 0 Comments
DRM and us
More In Business
- Facebook, Facebook, Facebook
- Survey: How are you using Facebook, Twitter, smart phones, and other technology platforms?
- Will Facebook be your CRM provider?
- Wiki Banking
- The importance of being competent
Entertainment - Aug 3, 2010 13:14 - 2 Comments
Want to see the future? Look to the games
More In Entertainment
- Lessons in collaboration from B.B. King’s
- CL!CK – LEGO’s fun social product development platform
- Peer Pressure 2.0: Farmville
- Online gaming more than just fun
- The NFL – The most protective league, attempting to control the uncontrollable
Society - Aug 6, 2010 8:19 - 4 Comments
The Empire strikes a light
More In Society
- Balance: customer receptivity vs. customer revulsion
- The Net Gen: Too plugged-in for parenting?
- Are you addicted to social media?
- The privacy discussion we need to have
- “The Data-Driven Life”: Who’s not interested in discovery?
[...] For more on this topic read this blog entry [...]