Business - Written by Denis Hancock on Monday, August 20, 2007 22:52 - 2 Comments
Stupid gaming epidemics
“Soon, the disease had spread to the densely populated capital cities of (——-), causing high rates of mortality and, much more importantly, the social chaos that comes from a large-scale outbreak of deadly disease” – Nina Fefferman and Eric Lofgren
So what is (——-)? Well that would be “the fantasy world”, as in World of WarCraft. Interestingly enough (as reported on MSNBC), a couple of years ago Blizzard Entertainment introduced a virus into the game, in order to make it more challenging for high level players – but just like that it upped and got itself out of the virtual containment area it was supposed to stay in.
Next thing you know, the disease was spreading like wildfire, and Fefferman and Lofgren started studying it to see what they could learn about how real world diseases spread. Among other things, Fefferman figured out she should build in a “stupid factor” for simulating disease breaks – i.e. people stupid enough to go have a quick look thinking they won’t be contaminated.
Anyways, the idea of learning about how epidemics might spread through analysis of virtual worlds seems kind of interesting… but actually I’m more interested in this stupid factor.
It seems everywhere I look our “models” assume rational behavoir on behalf of participants – from rational investment decisions leading to efficient markets, to not poking the virtual dude with the pulsating red spots, to politicians having war-time exit strategies. Inevitably, it turns out people always do stupid things and our rational models look foolish… could a common stupid factor help all disciplines?
2 Comments
Wikinomics » Blog Archive » Why do you play WoW?
[...] Why do you play WoW? Over the past year we have blogged on more than a few occasions about the MMOG World of Warcraft. How it has inspired solutions to email overload. How the U.S. player population is more than 4 times larger than the U.S. agricultural industry. We even talked about how the platform was being used to model the outbreak of infectious diseases. [...]
Leave a Reply
Browse Content
- The iPhone, growing up digital, and my daughter's education
- Playbor: When work and fun coincide
- Lessons in collaboration from B.B. King’s
- A decade of frustration ahead?
- Games, user experience, and retroactive Continuity--All enabled by platforms
- Survey: How prepared is the enterprise to lead in the age of unbounded data?
- When you ask customers to dance, let them lead
- Real world examples for collaboration ROI
- Will you use Target's mobile coupons?
- Mobile platform magic: Five things executives must know about mobility
- Addressing the social media ‘support gap’
- On unintended consequences
- Mobile platform magic: Five things executives must know about mobility
- Will you use Target’s mobile coupons?
- Lessons in collaboration from B.B. King’s
- Games, user experience, and retroactive Continuity–All enabled by platforms
- Survey: How prepared is the enterprise to lead in the age of unbounded data?
- A decade of frustration ahead?
- The iPhone, growing up digital, and my daughter’s education
- Real world examples for collaboration ROI
- Playbor: When work and fun coincide
- farmville is the best game ever and this is the best blog post!...
- Physicians are totally antiquated in their use of the computer. Its funny - a r...
- Great list of questions, Laura. Check out this post by someone who signed up for...
- Not everybody will have read Malthus. And the the title heading of this post app...
- Given the numbers not connected properly, there's continuous digital divide....
- Quite possibly....
- Due to global financial crisis companies and individuals are affected. Many work...
- Good post Naumi,
I like how you relate the jazz band performance to customer ...
Business - Mar 19, 2010 16:57 - 0 Comments
Addressing the social media ‘support gap’
More In Business
- Mobile platform magic: Five things executives must know about mobility
- Will you use Target’s mobile coupons?
- Games, user experience, and retroactive Continuity–All enabled by platforms
- Survey: How prepared is the enterprise to lead in the age of unbounded data?
- Real world examples for collaboration ROI
Entertainment - Mar 9, 2010 16:58 - 3 Comments
Lessons in collaboration from B.B. King’s
More In Entertainment
- CL!CK – LEGO’s fun social product development platform
- Peer Pressure 2.0: Farmville
- Online gaming more than just fun
- The NFL – The most protective league, attempting to control the uncontrollable
- The rise of computational photography and the birth of camera 2.0


Hello to everyone!
I’ve learnt about the study of Fefferman and Lofgren, and I’d like to share with you my thoughts. First, a clarification: what happened in World of Warcraft depended from a bug, not from the will of Blizzard Entertainment.
By the way, the core of the research relies on the applicability of the videogamers pattern of behaviour to the reality; I would not like to be radical, but this premise seems to me totally unrealistic. First of all, the disease in the game was easily curable. Such every fantasy worlds, the magic is embedded in, to the point that many characters are magicians, which are able to cure diseases with spells, and there are available many curative potions. This is a factor that reduces the range of the “stupid factor” identified by the authors. However, the focal point is another. Videogamers play Wow, a role-playing game, for fun. The possibility of playing the role of a plague-spreader was an exciting “easter-egg”; an innovative role, different from traditional ones, such as sorcerer, warrior, thief or rogue. Moreover, it was fun, as it involved many players at a time. Even in the first Morrowind, a game published by Bethesda Interactive, there was the “casual” possibility of becoming a lycanthrope and infecting all the other players.
By the way, the question to me is that playing the plague-spreader in a virtual world is absolutely NOT like as doing the same in the reality. In the virtual world there is not the possibility of damaging or killing someone: gamers kills avatars, and it’s not the same than killing a person. And in particular in a game whereas the Player-vs-Player gameplay is a strong point. In Wow, beating and eventually killing other players (in terms of avatars) is one of the aims of the game, so why not playing the plague-spreader and infecting other players? It is part of the game! If we accept the comparison virtual behaviour = real behaviour, we should also accept that in the Middle age part of the population find cool and funny to spread the Black Death…