Business - Written by Anthony D. Williams on Sunday, June 24, 2007 10:01 - 2 Comments
Lessig debunks Keen’s “Cult of the Amateur”
Lawrence Lessig’s vision of a “read-write” Internet (rather than a “read-only” Internet) is harshly and sloppily disparaged in Andrew Keen’s new polemic: The Cult of the Amateur. Lessig posted a characteristically brilliant response on his blog some time ago (which I only just had a chance to catch up with today). Lessig points out several fallacies in Keen’s book and then graciously suggests that we give poor Mr. Keen a break. Why? Because his book was a self-parody, after all!
So how could it be that a book criticizing the Internet — because the product of a standardless process where nothing is “vetted for accuracy” (as he says of Wikipedia) — could itself be so mistaken, when it, presumably, has been “vetted for accuracy” and was only selected for publication because it passed the high standards of truth imposed by its publisher — Doubleday?
And then it hit me: Keen is our generation’s greatest self-parodist. His book is not a criticism of the Internet. Like the article in Nature comparing Wikipedia and Britannica, the real argument of Keen’s book is that traditional media and publishing is just as bad as the worst of the Internet. Here’s a book — Keen’s — that has passed through all the rigor of modern American publishing, yet which is perhaps as reliable as your average blog post: No doubt interesting, sometimes well written, lots of times ridiculously over the top — but also riddled with errors. Keen’s obvious point is to show those with a blind faith in the traditional system that it can be just as bad as the worst of the Internet. Indeed, one might say even worse, since the Internet doesn’t primp itself with the pretense that its words are promised to be true.
So lighten up on poor Mr. Keen, folks. He is an ally. His work will help us all understand the limits in accuracy, taste, judgment, and understanding shot through all of our systems of knowledge. The lesson he teaches is one we should all learn — to read and think critically, whether reading the product of the “monkeys” (as Keen likens contributors to the Internet to be) or books published by presses such as Doubleday.
If you haven’t already read it, Lessig’s extended post is well worth 5 or 10 minutes of your time (which is more than I can say for Keen’s book).
2 Comments
[...] is harshly and sloppily disparaged in Andrew Keen&8217s new polemic: The Cult of the Amateur.http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2007/06/24/lessig-debunks-keens-cult-of-the-amateur-while-n…Indy 500: Newman/Haas/Lanigan Racing – Motorsport.comAT INDIANAPOLIS MOTOR SPEEDWAY: Will be his [...]
Business - Oct 5, 2010 12:00 - 0 Comments
DRM and us
More In Business
- Facebook, Facebook, Facebook
- Survey: How are you using Facebook, Twitter, smart phones, and other technology platforms?
- Will Facebook be your CRM provider?
- Wiki Banking
- The importance of being competent
Entertainment - Aug 3, 2010 13:14 - 2 Comments
Want to see the future? Look to the games
More In Entertainment
- Lessons in collaboration from B.B. King’s
- CL!CK – LEGO’s fun social product development platform
- Peer Pressure 2.0: Farmville
- Online gaming more than just fun
- The NFL – The most protective league, attempting to control the uncontrollable
Society - Aug 6, 2010 8:19 - 4 Comments
The Empire strikes a light
More In Society
- Balance: customer receptivity vs. customer revulsion
- The Net Gen: Too plugged-in for parenting?
- Are you addicted to social media?
- The privacy discussion we need to have
- “The Data-Driven Life”: Who’s not interested in discovery?

Coming soon in paperback! Help rename the paperback version of Macrowikinomics and win a one-hour webinar for you and your colleagues with Don Tapscott. Ends 5:00pm ET, August 31.
As mass collaboration gains power in the economy, notice the rising chorus of detractors. Keen is a good example. Nicholas Carr’s recent piece in Strategy and Business magazine — the Ignorance of Crowds — is another (although like his HBR piece — IT Doesn’t Matter — the title exaggerates his argument). Or witness recent talk about a new internet bubble.
As we’ve written for years, new paradigms cause dislocation and uncertainty and are nearly always received with coolness or hostility. Vested interests fight against change and leaders of the old have the greatest difficulty embracing the new. (Not to mention that new paradigms create great opportunities for detractors to get their 15 minutes of fame — irony notwithstanding).